Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33013658›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neurology2020

Management of MS Patients Treated With Daclizumab - a Case Series of 267 Patients.

Paulus S Rommer, Klaus Berger, David Ellenberger, Firas Fneish, Alexandra Simbrich, Alexander Stahmann, Uwe K Zettl

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. The role of CD56Journal of neuroinflammation · 2024
    Review
  3. Review
  4. The State of the Art of Pediatric Multiple Sclerosis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Paulus S RommerNeuroimmunological Section, Department of Neurology, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany.
Klaus BergerInstitute of Epidemiology and Social Medicine, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.
David EllenbergerGerman MS-Register by the German MS Society, MS Forschungs- und Projektentwicklungs-gGmbH, Hanover, Germany.
Firas FneishGerman MS-Register by the German MS Society, MS Forschungs- und Projektentwicklungs-gGmbH, Hanover, Germany.
Alexandra SimbrichInstitute of Epidemiology and Social Medicine, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.
Alexander StahmannGerman MS-Register by the German MS Society, MS Forschungs- und Projektentwicklungs-gGmbH, Hanover, Germany.
Uwe K ZettlNeuroimmunological Section, Department of Neurology, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Daclizumab was approved by the FDA and the EMA in 2016 for the treatment of relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis (MS). Cases of severe inflammatory brain disease with fatal outcome led to the withdrawal of approval in Europe and the US on March 2, 2018. Approximately 8,000 patients worldwide received daclizumab, but little is known about the further therapy management of these patients after the withdrawal of daclizumab. The aim of this study is to further analyze therapy management in MS patients after safety warnings and market withdrawal. Data from two registries in Germany, the German MS Registry (GMSR) and REGIMS, were used for this analysis. In total, 267 patients were included in this study. For almost 25% of patients (in the GMSR) daclizumab was the initial treatment. Most common pre-treatments were fingolimod, dimethyl fumarate, and natalizumab; various injectables summed up to 25.9%. The most common follow-up therapies were ocrelizumab and fingolimod. In most patients, follow-up therapies were administered shortly after discontinuation of daclizumab. The wash-out time for subsequent therapies varied between 1.2 and 4.0 months. Warnings and decisions by authorities led to a rapid decline and termination of therapies in both cohorts, indicating that such warnings have an immediate impact on the treatment landscape. Therapies that were started within a short time after the discontinuation of daclizumab were subsequently replaced by other therapies and may be considered as bridging therapies.

Indexed as

daclizumabmultiple sclerosismultiple sclerosis—drug therapyregistersside effects

Identifiers

PMID33013658
PMCPMC7506133

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.