Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33013516›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2020

Visual Attention Patterns Differ in Dog vs. Cat Interactions With Children With Typical Development or Autism Spectrum Disorders.

Marine Grandgeorge, Yentl Gautier, Yannig Bourreau, Heloise Mossu, Martine Hausberger

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Marine GrandgeorgeUniv Rennes, Normandie Univ, CNRS, EthoS (Éthologie animale et humaine) - UMR 6552, Rennes, France.
Yentl GautierUniv Rennes, Normandie Univ, CNRS, EthoS (Éthologie animale et humaine) - UMR 6552, Rennes, France.
Yannig BourreauUniv Rennes, Normandie Univ, CNRS, EthoS (Éthologie animale et humaine) - UMR 6552, Rennes, France.
Heloise MossuUniv Rennes, Normandie Univ, CNRS, EthoS (Éthologie animale et humaine) - UMR 6552, Rennes, France.
Martine HausbergerUniv Rennes, Normandie Univ, CNRS, EthoS (Éthologie animale et humaine) - UMR 6552, Rennes, France.
Université de Rennes · FRCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FREthologie animale et humaineNormandie Université · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Visual social attention is an important part of the social life of many species, including humans, but its patterning may vary between species. Studies on human-pet relationships have revealed that visual attention is also part of such interspecific interactions and that pets are sensitive to the human visual attentional state. It has been argued that domestication and/or repeated experiences with humans have shaped and refined these decoding abilities. Little is known on how the species' evolutionary history may play a role in determining visual attention patterns during interactions, nor how the human's own social skills may influence the animal's attention patterns in human-animal interactions. In the present study, we investigated the visual attention patterns directed to the partner in dog-child and cat-child interactions in their home environment. We also compared these patterns between a group of children with autism spectrum disorders (ASD) and children with typical development. We found that the attention patterns differed according to species, with dogs displaying more gazes and cats more glances toward their human interlocutor, while children showed gazes toward both species. Only slight differences were observed according to the developmental status of children: ASD children displayed much more visual attention with their pet cat than with their pet dog and the same amount of visual attention toward their pet, whatever the species, as typically developing (TD) children. Because humans rely a lot upon visual communication in their own social encounters, where direct gazes play a major role from early on, they may be especially sensitive to the gazing behavior of their dogs. People with ASD, with a less typical pattern of interaction, may be more comfortable with the less "invasive" short glances of cats. These results suggest not only that interspecific communication has to be associated with processing and storing the other species' ways of communicating in order to be successful but also that visual attention patterns during interactions, even when interspecific, are, for a large part, the result of the species' own evolutionary history.

Indexed as

autismcatsdogshuman–pet interactionssocial visual attention

Identifiers

PMID33013516
PMCPMC7499488
OpenAlexW3048669850

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.