SynthesisFrontiers in pharmacology2020
Effectiveness and Safety of Oral Anticoagulants in Older Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
42 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 86 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Potentially inappropriate prescribing in multimorbid and polymedicated older adults with AF: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Drugs & aging · 2024Pooled it
- Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants (NOACs) Versus Warfarin in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation Using P-gp and/or CYP450-Interacting Drugs: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Cardiovascular drugs and therapy · 2023Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Synthesis of the evidence on the impact of pre-operative direct oral anticoagulants on patient health outcomes after hip fracture surgery: rapid systematic review.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2022Pooled it
- Direct Oral Anticoagulants vs. Vitamin K Antagonists in Atrial Fibrillation Patients at Risk of Falling: A Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Pooled it
- Definition of Polypharmacy in Atrial Fibrillation and Atrial Flutter: A Scoping Review.Cardiology research · 2026Review
- Exploring pharmacist prescribing practices in general practices for atrial fibrillation in England: a qualitative study using the theoretical domains framework.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2026Article
- Functional fibrinolysis in older adults: clinical relevance and implications for personalised anticoagulation.GeroScience · 2026Review
- Impact of a history of falls on clinical outcomes in older adult non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients: an ANAFIE registry study.BMC geriatrics · 2026Observational
- Interactions Between Direct Oral Anticoagulants and Drugs Involving CYP-Enzymes and P-gp Transporters Detected by a Clinical Decision Support System: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Cardiovascular drugs and therapy · 2026Article
- Association between poor blood pressure control and intracranial haemorrhage-related mortality in patients with atrial fibrillation receiving oral anticoagulation: a retrospective observational cohort study.Frontiers in stroke · 2026Article
- Comorbidity and medication patterns in atrial fibrillation patients: association with adverse clinical outcomes.Internal and emergency medicine · 2025Article
- Impact of Age and Factor Xa Inhibitor Concentrations on Bleeding Risk in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2025Article
- Article
- Efficacy, safety, and bleeding risk factor analysis of oral anticoagulants in AF patients ≥ 65 years of age: a multicenter retrospective cohort study.BMC geriatrics · 2025Observational
- Influence of Ageing on the Pharmacodynamics and Pharmacokinetics of Chronically Administered Medicines in Geriatric Patients: A Review.Clinical pharmacokinetics · 2025Review
- Comparative effectiveness and safety of rivaroxaban with other oral anticoagulants in older adults with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation: population-based analysis in response to updated Beers Criteria.Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH · 2025Article
- Direct-Acting Oral Anticoagulants in the Management of Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis-Where Do We Stand?Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Direct Oral Anticoagulant Use in Older Adults with Atrial Fibrillation: Challenges and Solutions.European cardiology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectiveAtrial fibrillation (AF), the most common cardiac arrhythmia, typically increases with age. Oral anticoagulants (OACs) are the cornerstone of treatment to reduce the associated risk for systemic thromboembolism. Four large randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have shown that non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are non-inferior to vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in preventing stroke and systemic embolism, as well as regarding their risk for major bleeding. However, as vulnerable geriatric patients with AF were largely underrepresented in these trials, physicians are faced with the challenge of choosing the right anticoagulant for geriatric patients in real-life clinical practice. In this vulnerable patient group, NOACs tend to be underused or underdosed due to concerns of excessive fall-related intracranial bleeding, cognitive impairment, multiple drug-drug interactions, low body weight or impaired renal function. As life expectancy continues to rise worldwide, the number of geriatric patients substantially increases. Therefore, there is an urgent need for a critical appraisal of the added value of NOACs in geriatric patients with AF at high thromboembolic and bleeding risk. METHODS AND
resultsThis systematic review provides an overview of the literature on the impact of increased age (≥75 years), multimorbidity, polypharmacy, increased falling risk, frailty and dementia on the effectiveness and safety of NOACs as compared to VKAs, after searching the Medline database. Moreover, a meta-analysis on the impact of increased age ≥75 years old was performed after pooling results from 6
conclusionAcross geriatric subgroups, apixaban was consistently associated with the most favourable benefit-risk profile and should therefore be preferred in geriatric patients with AF. However, research gaps on the impact of increased falling risk, frailty and baseline dementia were identified, requiring careful consideration while awaiting more results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.