Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33013312›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2020

Resting-State Functional Connectivity Patterns Predict Acupuncture Treatment Response in Primary Dysmenorrhea.

Siyi Yu, Mingguo Xie, Shuqin Liu, Xiaoli Guo, Jin Tian, Wei Wei, Qi Zhang, Fang Zeng, Fanrong Liang, Jie Yang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Siyi YuBrain Research Center, Department of Acupuncture & Tuina, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China.
Mingguo XieDepartment of Radiology, Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China.
Shuqin LiuDepartment of Radiology, Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China.
Xiaoli GuoBrain Research Center, Department of Acupuncture & Tuina, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China.
Jin TianBrain Research Center, Department of Acupuncture & Tuina, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China.
Wei WeiBrain Research Center, Department of Acupuncture & Tuina, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China.
Qi ZhangBrain Research Center, Department of Acupuncture & Tuina, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China.
Fang ZengBrain Research Center, Department of Acupuncture & Tuina, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China.
Fanrong LiangBrain Research Center, Department of Acupuncture & Tuina, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China.
Jie YangBrain Research Center, Department of Acupuncture & Tuina, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Primary dysmenorrhea (PDM) is a common complaint in women throughout the menstrual years. Acupuncture has been shown to be effective in dysmenorrhea; however, there are large interindividual differences in patients' responses to acupuncture treatment. Fifty-four patients with PDM were recruited and randomized into real or sham acupuncture treatment groups (over the course of three menstrual cycles). Pain-related functional connectivity (FC) matrices were constructed at baseline and post-treatment period. The different neural mechanisms altered by real and sham acupuncture were detected with multivariate analysis of variance. Multivariate pattern analysis (MVPA) based on a machine learning approach was used to explore whether the different FC patterns predicted the acupuncture treatment response in the PDM patients. The results showed that real but not sham acupuncture significantly relieved pain severity in PDM patients. Real and sham acupuncture displayed differences in FC alterations between the descending pain modulatory system (DPMS) and sensorimotor network (SMN), the salience network (SN) and SMN, and the SN and default mode network (DMN). Furthermore, MVPA found that these FC patterns at baseline could predict the acupuncture treatment response in PDM patients. The present study verified differentially altered brain mechanisms underlying real and sham acupuncture in PDM patients and supported the use of neuroimaging biomarkers for individual-based precise acupuncture treatment in patients with PDM.

Indexed as

acupuncturefunctional connectivitymachine learningmultivariate pattern analysesprimary dysmenorrhea

Identifiers

PMID33013312
PMCPMC7506136

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.