Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33013136›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of surgical oncology2020

Outcome of TRUS Biopsy with Limited Cores in Patients with PSA More Than 50 ng/dL: Can We Reduce the Number of Cores Without Affecting Outcomes?

Abhishek Laddha, Appu Thomas, Deepak Chandran Nair, Greeshma C Ravindran, Ginil Kumar Pooleri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of surgical oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Abhishek LaddhaDepartment of Urology, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Center, AIMS Ponekkara, P.0, Kochi, Kerala 682041 India.ORCID 0000-0003-1761-1783
Appu ThomasDepartment of Urology, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Center, AIMS Ponekkara, P.0, Kochi, Kerala 682041 India.
Deepak Chandran NairDepartment of Urology, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Center, AIMS Ponekkara, P.0, Kochi, Kerala 682041 India.
Greeshma C RavindranDepartment of Biostatistics, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Center, Kochi, Kerala India.
Ginil Kumar PooleriDepartment of Biostatistics, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Center, Kochi, Kerala India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aims of our study were to see outcomes of limited core biopsy and compare its outcomes with standard 12-core biopsy in patients with PSA more than 50 ng/dL. We did a retrospective analysis of 149 patients undergoing prostatic biopsy with PSA more than 50 ng/dL between January 2014 and December 2018. Out of 149 patients, 49 underwent limited core (2 to 6 cores) TRUS biopsy with no systemic 12-core biopsy. Other 100 patients underwent standard 12-core biopsy under TRUS guidance. Total of 149 patient's records were analyzed and were included in the final analysis. There was no significant difference in demographics and prostate-specific antigen among the cohorts. All 49 patients in limited core TRUS biopsy had a positive biopsy with no need of re-biopsy. Fourteen out of 100 patients in TRUS biopsy had a negative biopsy. All 14 patients with negative biopsy had an average follow-up of 3.8 years with no conversion to positive biopsy. Patients with PSA more than 50 ng/dL and high clinical suspicion of prostate cancer can undergo limited core biopsy without systemic 12-core biopsy. In patients with no clinical evidence of prostate cancer, 12-core biopsy remains the gold standard for evaluation of prostate cancer.

Indexed as

Prostate cancerPSATRUS biopsy

Identifiers

PMID33013136
PMCPMC7501352

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.