ArticleIndian journal of surgical oncology2020
Oncological and Functional Outcomes of Conservation Surgery for Carcinoma Glottis.
Article in Indian journal of surgical oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Salvage (Total) Laryngectomy Rates Following Organ Preservation Strategies in India: Do We Have the Answer?Indian journal of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Survival and Quality of Life (QoL) Enhancing Effect of Surgery in Larynx and Hypopharynx Cancers.Indian journal of surgical oncology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Conservation laryngectomy has gained considerable acceptance as a means of enhancing overall long-term function preservation in the management of glottic cancers. This study aims to evaluate the oncological and functional outcomes of conservation surgery for carcinoma of the glottis. Fifty consecutive conservation laryngectomies from January 2010 to December 2018 were studied. Glottic cancers of stages I to IVa were carefully selected both in the primary and salvage settings after a consensus from the multidisciplinary tumour board (MDT). Oncological outcomes in terms of overall survival and disease-free survival were measured, and the long-term functional outcomes of voice and swallowing were evaluated using the GRBAS vocal scale and SWAL-QOL questionnaire. The median follow-up period was 63.4 months. The overall 5-year survival probability was 98% (standard error 2.2%), while median disease-free survival was 23 months. The median GRBAS scores in the open and transoral laser microsurgery (TOLMS) group were 1.828 and 1.428, respectively. The median SWAL-QOL scores in majority of quality of life domains were in the mild or no disease impact zone (71-100). Conservative laryngeal surgery plays a crucial role in the treatment of glottic cancers in all stages. It is oncologically safe, and the functional outcomes are favourable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.