Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33013095›Full record

ArticleJournal of emergencies, trauma, and shock

Pediatric Risk of Mortality III Score - Predictor of Mortality and Hospital Stay in Pediatric Intensive Care Unit.

Amarpreet Kaur, Gurmeet Kaur, Shashi Kant Dhir, Seema Rai, Amanpreet Sethi, Avneet Brar, Paramdeep Singh

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of emergencies, trauma, and shock. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Comparison of pSOFA with PRISM III and PIM 2 as Predictors of Outcome in a Tertiary Care Pediatric ICU: A Prospective Cross-sectional Study.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Amarpreet KaurDepartment of Pediatrics, Guru Gobind Singh Medical College and Hospital, Faridkot, India.
Gurmeet KaurDepartment of Pediatrics, Guru Gobind Singh Medical College and Hospital, Faridkot, India.
Shashi Kant DhirDepartment of Pediatrics, Guru Gobind Singh Medical College and Hospital, Faridkot, India.
Seema RaiDepartment of Pediatrics, Guru Gobind Singh Medical College and Hospital, Faridkot, India.
Amanpreet SethiDepartment of Pediatrics, Guru Gobind Singh Medical College and Hospital, Faridkot, India.
Avneet BrarDepartment of Pediatrics, Government Medical College and Hospital, Amritsar, Punjab, India.
Paramdeep SinghDepartment of Radiology, Guru Gobind Singh Medical College and Hospital, Faridkot, India.
Guru Gobind Singh Medical College and Hospital · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPediatric Risk of Mortality (PRISM) III score is one of the widely used scoring systems to quantify critical illness in the pediatric age group. This study was carried out to find the association of PRISM III score with the outcome (discharge/mortality) and also hospital stay in survivors and nonsurvivors.

settingThe study was conducted in a tertiary care hospital from January 2014 to June 2015. MATERIALS AND

methodsA total of 524 patients were admitted, and after excluding the patients who met the exclusion criteria, 486 patients were analyzed. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Logistic regression was used to find the association of variables under the PRISM III score with mortality. Linear regression was used to find the association of PRISM III score with length of stay.

resultsMortality was 31%; male: female ratio was 1.5:1. Maximum patients presented with respiratory system involvement (26.3%), and maximum mortality (20.3%) was observed in the patients with respiratory involvement. Discrimination by the model between mortality and survival was excellent (receiver operating characteristic curve [0.903]). Maximum risk of mortality was noticed in mechanically ventilated patients (odds ratio [OR]: 10.87) followed by lower systolic blood pressure (OR: 2.72), deranged prothrombin time, partial thromboplastin time (OR: 1.50), deranged mental status (OR: 1.41), and tachycardia (OR: 1.37). Length of stay (LOS) in patients increased till PRISM III score of 25. Average LOS in survivors was 4.327 days which was not accounted by difference in PRISM III score between different patients. With each unit increase in PRISM III score, LOS increased by 5 h.

conclusionsPRISM III score has excellent capacity to discriminate between survival and mortality. PRISM III score can be used to predict LOS among survivors.

Indexed as

Length of staymortalityPediatric Risk of Mortality III scorereceiver operating characteristic curve

Identifiers

PMID33013095
PMCPMC7472814
OpenAlexW3034649761

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.