ArticleAphasiology2020
Effect of lexical accessibility on syntactic production in aphasia: An eyetracking study.
Article in Aphasiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- The curious case of the Cat Rescue: can picture narrative description inform visuospatial processing in aphasia?Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2025Article
- Article
- Online Eye Tracking for Aphasia: A Feasibility Study Comparing Web and Lab Tracking and Implications for Clinical Use.Brain and behavior · 2024Article
- Coordinating Words and Sentences: Detecting Age-Related Changes in Language Production.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2024Article
- Syntactic flexibility and lexical encoding in aging sentence production: an eye tracking study.Frontiers in psychology · 2024Article
- Planning sentence production in aphasia: evidence from structural priming and eye-tracking.Frontiers in language sciences · 2023Article
- A reconceptualization of sentence production in post-stroke agrammatic aphasia: the synergistic processing bottleneck model.Frontiers in language sciences · 2023Article
- Implicit structural priming as a treatment component for aphasia: Specifying essential learning conditions.Cognitive neuropsychologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
purposeHealthy speakers use both word-level and structure-level information to ease sentence production processes. Structural priming facilitates message-structure mapping in aphasia. However, it remains unclear if and how word-level information affects off-line and on-line sentence production in persons with aphasia (PWA). This eyetracking-while-speaking study examined the effect of lexical priming on production of syntactic (active/passive) structures in PWA.
methodEleven PWA and twenty healthy older adults (HOA) described transitive actions (
resultsHOA showed increased production of passives over actives in the Theme vs. Agent prime condition. In eye fixation data, HOA showed priming-induced Theme advantage from the earliest time window (picture onset-400 milliseconds). PWA also showed a significant priming effect in off-line sentence production, with this priming effect being greater for the individuals whose syntactic processing is better preserved. In eye fixation data, however, PWA showed preferential fixations to the primed character at a later stage of sentence planning (400-800 milliseconds), following equal fixation time to Agent and Theme during the earliest time window.
conclusionHOA showed word-driven production in both off-line and real-time (eye fixations) production. Lexical accessibility effectively drove off-line syntactic production in PWA, especially for those whose syntactic capacity remains relatively preserved. However, PWA showed advanced processing of both characters in earliest eye fixation data, suggesting that successful word-driven off-line syntactic production was associated with atypical real-time sentence planning in aphasia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.