Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33012602›Full record

ArticleVaccine2020

Ensemble forecast modeling for the design of COVID-19 vaccine efficacy trials.

Natalie E Dean, Ana Pastore Y Piontti, Zachary J Madewell, Derek A T Cummings, Matthew D T Hitchings, Keya Joshi, Rebecca Kahn, Alessandro Vespignani, M Elizabeth Halloran, Ira M Longini

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. An epidemic-economic model for COVID-19.Mathematical biosciences and engineering : MBE · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Natalie E DeanDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States. Electronic address: nataliedean@ufl.edu.
Ana Pastore Y PionttiLaboratory for the Modeling of Biological and Socio-technical Systems, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, United States.
Zachary J MadewellDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.
Derek A T CummingsDepartment of Biology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.
Matthew D T HitchingsDepartment of Biology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.
Keya JoshiCenter for Communicable Disease Dynamics, Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States.
Rebecca KahnCenter for Communicable Disease Dynamics, Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States.
Alessandro VespignaniLaboratory for the Modeling of Biological and Socio-technical Systems, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, United States.
M Elizabeth HalloranFred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, United States; Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.
Ira M LonginiDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.

Funding

Methods for Evaluating Vaccine EfficacyR37AI032042 · NIAID · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI HALLORAN, M ELIZABETH · 2010 to 2019
$5.1M
Design and Analysis of Vaccine Trials for Emerging Infectious Disease ThreatsR01AI139761 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI DEAN, NATALIE EXNER · 2018 to 2022
$3.6M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI139761NIAID NIH HHS R37 AI032042
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To rapidly evaluate the safety and efficacy of COVID-19 vaccine candidates, prioritizing vaccine trial sites in areas with high expected disease incidence can speed endpoint accrual and shorten trial duration. Mathematical and statistical forecast models can inform the process of site selection, integrating available data sources and facilitating comparisons across locations. We recommend the use of ensemble forecast modeling - combining projections from independent modeling groups - to guide investigators identifying suitable sites for COVID-19 vaccine efficacy trials. We describe an appropriate structure for this process, including minimum requirements, suggested output, and a user-friendly tool for displaying results. Importantly, we advise that this process be repeated regularly throughout the trial, to inform decisions about enrolling new participants at existing sites with waning incidence versus adding entirely new sites. These types of data-driven models can support the implementation of flexible efficacy trials tailored to the outbreak setting.

Indexed as

BetacoronavirusClinical Trials as TopicCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesForecastingHumansModels, TheoreticalPandemicsPneumonia, ViralSARS-CoV-2Viral VaccinesCOVID-19 VaccinesViral VaccinesEfficacy trialEnsemble modelingForecast modelTrial planning

Identifiers

PMID33012602
PMCPMC7492005

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.