Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33012350›Full record

ReviewMayo Clinic proceedings2020

Forgotten Technology in the COVID-19 Pandemic: Filtration Properties of Cloth and Cloth Masks-A Narrative Review.

Catherine M Clase, Edouard L Fu, Aurneen Ashur, Rupert C L Beale, Imogen A Clase, Myrna B Dolovich, Meg J Jardine, Meera Joseph, Grace Kansiime, Johannes F E Mann and 3 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Mayo Clinic proceedings, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 77 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A Review of Filtration Performance of Protective Masks.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Masks for COVID-19.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2022
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 9 institutions in 8 countries.

Catherine M ClaseDivision of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; St Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton, Hamilton, Canada; Centre of Excellence in Protective Equipment and Materials. Electronic address: clase@mcmaster.ca.
Edouard L FuDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Aurneen AshurDivision of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Rupert C L BealeFrancis Crick Institute, London, UK.
Imogen A ClaseDivision of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Myrna B DolovichDivision of Respirology, Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Meg J JardineThe George Institute for Global Health and Concord Repatriation General Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
Meera JosephDivision of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; Mulago National Referral Hospital, Kampala, Uganda.
Grace KansiimeDivision of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Johannes F E MannDepartment of Nephrology, Hypertension & Rheumatology at Munich General Hospitals, University of Erlangen-Nürnberg, KfH Kidney Center, Munich-Schwabing, Germany.
Roberto Pecoits-FilhoDOPPS Program, Arbor Research Collaborative for Health, Ann Arbor, MI, and School of Medicine, Pontifical Catholic University of Paraná, Curitiba, Brazil.
Wolfgang C WinkelmayerSection of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX.
Juan J CarreroDepartment of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
McMaster University · CABaylor College of Medicine · USConcord Repatriation General Hospital · AUImpact · CAKarolinska Institutet · SELeiden University Medical Center · NLMulago Hospital · UGPontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná · BRThe Francis Crick Institute · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Management of the global crisis of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic requires detailed appraisal of evidence to support clear, actionable, and consistent public health messaging. The use of cloth masks for general public use is being debated, and is in flux. We searched the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases and Google for articles reporting the filtration properties of flat cloth or cloth masks. We reviewed the reference lists of relevant articles to identify further articles and identified articles through social and conventional news media. We found 25 articles. Study of protection for the wearer used healthy volunteers, or used a manikin wearing a mask, with airflow to simulate different breathing rates. Studies of protection of the environment, also known as source control, used convenience samples of healthy volunteers. The design and execution of the studies was generally rigorously described. Many descriptions of cloth lacked the detail required for reproducibility; no study provided all the expected details of material, thread count, weave, and weight. Some of the homemade mask designs were reproducible. Successful masks were made of muslin at 100 threads per inch (TPI) in 3 to 4 layers (4-layer muslin or a muslin-flannel-muslin sandwich), tea towels (also known as dish towels), made using 1 layer (2 layers would be expected to be better), and good-quality cotton T-shirts in 2 layers (with a stitched edge to prevent stretching). In flat-cloth experiments, linen tea towels, 600-TPI cotton in 2 layers, and 600-TPI cotton with 90-TPI flannel performed well but 80-TPI cotton in 2 layers did not. We therefore recommend cotton or flannel at least 100 TPI, at least 2 layers. More layers, 3 or 4, will provide increased filtration but there is a trade-off in that more layers increases the resistance to breathing. Although this is not a systematic review, we included all the articles that we identified in an unbiased way. We did not include gray literature or preprints. A plain language summary of these data and recommendations, as well as information on making, wearing and cleaning cloth masks is available at www.clothmasks.ca.

Indexed as

BetacoronavirusAdultCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19HumansMasksPandemicsPneumonia, ViralSARS-CoV-2Textiles

Identifiers

PMID33012350
PMCPMC7834536
OpenAlexW3046257958

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.