ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2021
Accuracy, uncertainty, and interpretability assessments of ANFIS models to predict dust concentration in semi-arid regions.
Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Predicting the dust events frequency around a degraded ecosystem and determining the contribution of their controlling factors using gradient boosting-based approaches and game theory.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2022Article
- MODWT-ANN hybrid models for daily precipitation estimates with time-delayed entries in Amazon region.Environmental monitoring and assessment · 2022Article
- Dust storm index anomaly for sand-dust events monitoring in western Iran and its association with the NDVI and LST anomalies.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2022Article
- Using multivariate adaptive regression splines and extremely randomized trees algorithms to predict dust events frequency around an international wetland and prioritize its drivers.Environmental monitoring and assessment · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate prediction of the dust concentration (DC) is necessary to reduce its undesirable environmental effects in different geographical areas. Although the adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) is a powerful model for predicting dust events, no attempt has been made to investigate its uncertainty and interpretability. In this study, therefore, the uncertainty of the ANFIS model was quantified using uncertainty estimation based on local errors and clustering methods. Furthermore, we used a model-agnostic interpretation to make the ANFIS model interpretable. In addition, we used the bat optimization algorithm (BAT) to increase the prediction accuracy of the ANFIS model. Seven explanatory variables were chosen for predicting DC in the cold and warm months across semi-arid regions of Iran. The results showed that the ANFIS+BAT model increased the correlation coefficient by 10% and 16% for predicting DC in the cold and warm months, respectively, compared with the ANFIS model. Furthermore, the uncertainty analysis indicated a lower prediction interval (i.e., lower uncertainty) for the ANFIS+BAT model compared with the ANFIS model for predicting DC in the cold and warm months. In addition, the model-agnostic interpretation tool findings indicated the highest contributions of air temperature and maximum wind speed for predicting DC in the cold and warm months, respectively. Prediction of DC using the proposed model will allow decision-makers to better plan for measures to mitigate the risks of wind erosion and air pollution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
33011943What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.