Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33011917›Full record

ArticleAmbio2021

Beyond 'trees are good': Disservices, management costs, and tradeoffs in urban forestry.

Lara A Roman, Tenley M Conway, Theodore S Eisenman, Andrew K Koeser, Camilo Ordóñez Barona, Dexter H Locke, G Darrel Jenerette, Johan Östberg, Jess Vogt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ambio, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Manhattan's Street Trees: An Unfinished Public Health Story.American journal of public health · 2025
    Article
  12. Tree diversity across the Minneapolis-St. Paul Metropolitan Area in relation to climate and social vulnerability.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Lara A RomanUSDA Forest Service, Northern Research Station, Philadelphia Field Station, 100 N. 20th St., Philadelphia, PA, 19095, USA. lara.roman@usda.gov.
Tenley M ConwayDepartment of Geography, University of Toronto- Mississauga, 3359 Mississauga Rd, Mississauga, ON, L5L 1C6, Canada.
Theodore S EisenmanUniversity of Massachusetts-Amherst, 333 Design Building, 551 North Pleasant Street, Amherst, MA, 01003, USA.
Andrew K KoeserUniversity of Florida Gulf Coast Research and Education Center, 14625 CR 672, Wimauma, FL, 33598, USA.
Camilo Ordóñez BaronaSchool of Ecosystem and Forest Science (SEFS), Burnley Campus, Faculty of Science, The University of Melbourne, 500 Yarra Boulevard, Richmond, VIC, 3121, Australia.
Dexter H LockeUSDA Forest Service, Northern Research Station, Baltimore Field Station, 5523 Research Park Dr, Suite 350, Baltimore, MD, 21227, USA.
G Darrel JeneretteDepartment of Botany & Plant Sciences, 900 University Ave., Riverside, CA, 92521, USA.
Johan ÖstbergSwedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Box 66, 23053, Alnarp, Sweden.
Jess VogtDePaul University, 1 E Jackson Blvd, Chicago, IL, 60604, USA.

Funding

Australian Research Council LP160100780National Science Foundation (US) DBI-1052875National Science Foundation (US) DEB-1924288
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The provision of ecosystem services is a prominent rationale for urban greening, and there is a prevailing mantra that 'trees are good'. However, understanding how urban trees contribute to sustainability must also consider disservices. In this perspective article, we discuss recent research on ecosystem disservices of urban trees, including infrastructure conflicts, health and safety impacts, aesthetic issues, and environmentally detrimental consequences, as well as management costs related to ecological disturbances and risk management. We also discuss tradeoffs regarding species selection and local conservation concerns, as well as the central role of human perception in the interpretation of ecosystem services and disservices, particularly the uncritical assertion that 'everybody loves trees'. Urban forestry decision-making that fails to account for disservices can have unintended negative consequences for communities. Further research is needed regarding life cycle assessments, stakeholder decision-making, return-on-investment, and framings of services and disservices in urban forestry.

Indexed as

ForestryTreesConservation of Natural ResourcesEcosystemHumansEcosystem disservicesGreen infrastructureNegative synergiesPositive synergiesUrban ecosystemsUrban sustainability

Identifiers

PMID33011917
PMCPMC7882647

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.