ArticleBiotechnology letters2021
Heparin stimulates biofilm formation of Escherichia coli strain Nissle 1917.
Article in Biotechnology letters, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Biofilms: from the cradle of life to life support.NPJ biofilms and microbiomes · 2026Review
- Repurposing High-Throughput Screening Reveals Unconventional Drugs with Antimicrobial and Antibiofilm Potential Against Methicillin-ResistantAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Inhibition of bacterial swimming by heparin binding of flagellin FliC from Escherichia coli strain Nissle 1917.Archives of microbiology · 2023Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesEscherichia coli strain Nissle 1917 (EcN), a gut probiotic competing with pathogenic bacteria, has been used to attenuate various intestinal dysfunctions. Heparin is a sulfated glycosaminoglycan enriched in the human and animal intestinal mucosa, which has a close connection with bacterial biofilm formation. However, the characteristics of heparin affecting bacterial biofilm formation remain obscure. In this study, we investigated the influence of heparin and its derivatives on EcN biofilm formation.
resultsHere, we found that heparin stimulated EcN biofilm formation in a dose-dependent manner. With the addition of native heparin, the EcN biofilm formation increased 6.9- to 10.8-fold than that without heparin, and was 1.4-, 3.1-, 3.0-, and 3.8-fold higher than that of N-desulfated heparin (N-DS), 2-O-desulfated heparin (2-O-DS), 6-O-desulfated heparin (6-O-DS), and N-/2-O-/6-O-desulfated heparin (N-/2-O-/6-O-DS), respectively. Depolymerization of heparin produced chain-shortened heparin fragments with decreased molecular weight. The depolymerized heparins did not stimulate EcN biofilm formation. The OD570 value of EcN biofilm with the addition of chain-shortened heparin fragments was 8.7-fold lower than that of the native heparin. Furthermore, the biofilm formation of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium was also investigated with the addition of heparin derivatives, and the results were consistent with that of EcN biofilm formation.
conclusionsWe conclude that heparin stimulated EcN biofilm formation. Both the sulfation and chain-length of heparin contributed to the enhancement of EcN biofilm formation. This study increases the understanding of how heparin affects biofilm formation, indicating the potential role of heparin in promoting intestinal colonization of probiotics that antagonize pathogen infections.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.