Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33011871›Full record

ArticleEsophagus : official journal of the Japan Esophageal Society2021

Patterns of esophageal dysmotility elicited by multiple rapid swallows.

Micheal Tadros, Victoria Tran, Virali Shah, Michael Yodice

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Esophagus : official journal of the Japan Esophageal Society, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Esophageal Motility Patterns in Paraesophageal Hernia Patients Compared to Sliding Hiatal Hernia: Bigger Is Not Better.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2023
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Micheal TadrosDivision of Gastroenterology-Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Albany Medical College, Albany, NY, USA. Tadrosm1@amc.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-3118-3893
Victoria TranDivision of Gastroenterology-Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Albany Medical College, Albany, NY, USA.
Virali ShahDivision of Gastroenterology-Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Albany Medical College, Albany, NY, USA.
Michael YodiceDivision of Gastroenterology-Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Albany Medical College, Albany, NY, USA.
Albany Medical Center Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHigh-resolution manometry (HRM) is a gastrointestinal motility diagnostic system that measures intraluminal pressures using closely aligned sensors. Multiple rapid swallows (MRS) are used in conjunction with HRM to assess esophageal physiology prior to anti-reflux and hiatal hernia procedures.

methodsA retrospective, qualitative study was conducted on 90 patients who underwent HRM with MRS in a single community clinic. 80 patients met the inclusion criteria. MRS testing consisted of rapid 2 mL swallows in 2-3 s intervals with patients in a seated, upright position. Clinical information was reviewed including indications for HRM, prior diagnostic workup, manometry, distal contractile integral (DCI), and integrated residual pressure (IRP). HRM studies were visualized using Manoview Analysis Software v3.0 (Medtronic).

resultsCertain esophageal dysmotility and pressurization manometry patterns were previously undetected on HRM alone. In our study, the addition of MRS was clinically helpful in (1) assessing contraction reserve, (2) highlighting features of jackhammer, (3) stimulating esophageal spasm, and (4) visualizing distal esophageal pressurization pattern with mechanical obstruction. Additionally, abnormal pathophysiology such as (5) paradoxical LES contraction (achalasia) and (6) loss of deglutition inhibition were identified. MRS had a diagnostic utility of 21.25% (n = 17) among the 80 patients. An intolerance rate of 7.7% (n = 7) was observed in patients unable to complete the protocol.

conclusionsAugmentation of HRM with MRS produces unique manometric features that have clinical utility in uncovering esophageal disorders. MRS provocation testing is a practical, inexpensive, well-tolerated addition to HRM that may yield useful clinical information to guide complicated diagnoses and medical management.

Indexed as

Esophageal Motility DisordersEsophageal Spasm, DiffuseDeglutitionHumansManometryRetrospective StudiesChicago classification systemEsophageal dysmotilityMultiple rapid swallow

Identifiers

PMID33011871
OpenAlexW3089972466

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.