ArticleInternational journal of colorectal disease2021
Early versus delayed endoscopic treatment of acute pilonidal abscess: a propensity score-matched analysis.
Article in International journal of colorectal disease, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Endoscopic Treatment of Pilonidal Sinus Disease: State of Art and Review of the Literature.Frontiers in surgery · 2021Pooled it
- Effect of sinus resection combined with vacuum-assisted closure on sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus.International wound journal · 2023Trial
- Five-year recurrence after endoscopic approach to pilonidal sinus disease: A multicentre experience.Techniques in coloproctology · 2023Article
- Endoscopic approach to complex or recurrent pilonidal sinus: A retrospective analysis.International wound journal · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAccording to the Italian Society of Colorectal Surgery guidelines, the most effective approach to the pilonidal abscess is adequate surgical drainage, concerning incision and drainage of the pilonidal cavity. Few recent studies have demonstrated that endoscopic approach could be a valid treatment option even in the case of acute pilonidal abscess. The aim of our study is to assess if video-assisted ablation of pilonidal sinus (VAAPS) could be an alternative to treat an acute pilonidal abscess and to evaluate if an immediate endoscopic approach to the pilonidal abscess is preferable to a delayed procedure after incision and drainage.
methodsAll consecutive patients with an acute pilonidal abscess since 1 January 2014 to 31 December 2018 were enrolled in our propensity score-matched analysis and divided into two groups: the early VAAPS group and the delayed VAAPS group. Primary outcomes were recurrence rate at 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year follow-up. Secondary outcomes were time off, time to wound healing, incomplete wound healing, perioperative infection, patients' satisfaction 1 month after the complete wound healing, and their health status before surgery and 6 months after complete wound healing.
resultsAfter the propensity score matching, 82 patients were included in the final analysis (41 in each group). No differences were found in terms of recurrence in the two groups. Early endoscopic approach was associated with a better patients' satisfaction (8.17 ± 1.2 vs 6.06 ± 1.48, p = 0.001) and a better postoperative health status (86.27 ± 6.54 vs 77.32 ± 5.85, p = 0.001).
conclusionsOur results encouraged to perform an immediate endoscopic approach to an acute pilonidal abscess.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.