Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33011839›Full record

ArticleAnalytical and bioanalytical chemistry2020

Analysis of glyphosate, aminomethylphosphonic acid, and glufosinate from human urine by HRAM LC-MS.

Adrian A Franke, Xingnan Li, Jennifer F Lai

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Quantification of glyphosate and glufosinate in human blood using the aqueous layer recovered from QuEChERS extraction.Analytical sciences : the international journal of the Japan Society for Analytical Chemistry · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Adrian A FrankeUniversity of Hawaii Cancer Center, Analytical Biochemistry Shared Resource, 701 Ilalo Street, Honolulu, HI, 96813, USA. adrian@cc.hawaii.edu.
Xingnan LiUniversity of Hawaii Cancer Center, Analytical Biochemistry Shared Resource, 701 Ilalo Street, Honolulu, HI, 96813, USA.
Jennifer F LaiUniversity of Hawaii Cancer Center, Analytical Biochemistry Shared Resource, 701 Ilalo Street, Honolulu, HI, 96813, USA.
University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa · USUniversity of Hawaii System · US

Funding

University of Hawaii Cancer Center CCSGP30CA071789 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII AT MANOA · PI GERTRAUD MASKARINEC · 1996 to 2026
$56.2M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA071789NCI NIH HHS P30 CA71789
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aminomethylphosphonic acid (AMPA) is the main metabolite of glyphosate (GLYP) and phosphonic acids in detergents. GLYP is a synthetic herbicide frequently used worldwide alone or together with its analog glufosinate (GLUF). The general public can be exposed to these potentially harmful chemicals; thus, sensitive methods to monitor them in humans are urgently required to evaluate health risks. We attempted to simultaneously detect GLYP, AMPA, and GLUF in human urine by high-resolution accurate-mass liquid chromatography mass spectrometry (HRAM LC-MS) before and after derivatization with 9-fluorenylmethoxycarbonyl chloride (Fmoc-Cl) or 1-methylimidazole-sulfonyl chloride (ImS-Cl) with several urine pre-treatment and solid phase extraction (SPE) steps. Fmoc-Cl derivatization achieved the best combination of method sensitivity (limit of detection; LOD) and accuracy for all compounds compared to underivatized urine or ImS-Cl-derivatized urine. Before derivatization, the best steps for GLYP involved 0.4 mM ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) pre-treatment followed by SPE pre-cleanup (LOD 37 pg/mL), for AMPA involved no EDTA pre-treatment and no SPE pre-cleanup (LOD 20 pg/mL) or 0.2-0.4 mM EDTA pre-treatment with no SPE pre-cleanup (LOD 19-21 pg/mL), and for GLUF involved 0.4 mM EDTA pre-treatment and no SPE pre-cleanup (LOD 7 pg/mL). However, for these methods, accuracy was sufficient only for AMPA (101-105%), while being modest for GLYP (61%) and GLUF (63%). Different EDTA and SPE treatments prior to Fmoc-Cl derivatization resulted in high sensitivity for all analytes but satisfactory accuracy only for AMPA. Thus, we conclude that our HRAM LC-MS method is suited for urinary AMPA analysis in cross-sectional studies.

Indexed as

AminobutyratesChromatography, LiquidGlycineGlyphosateHerbicidesHumansLimit of DetectionMass SpectrometryOrganophosphonatesReproducibility of ResultsSolid Phase ExtractionAminobutyratesaminomethylphosphonic acid (AMPA)GlycineGlyphosateHerbicidesOrganophosphonatesphosphinothricinAminomethylphosphonic acidGlufosinateGlyphosateHumansLC-MSUrine

Identifiers

PMID33011839
PMCPMC8061706
OpenAlexW3091561382

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.