Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33011665›Full record

ArticleComputer methods and programs in biomedicine2020

Influence of medical domain knowledge on deep learning for Alzheimer's disease prediction.

Branimir Ljubic, Shoumik Roychoudhury, Xi Hang Cao, Martin Pavlovski, Stefan Obradovic, Richard Nair, Lucas Glass, Zoran Obradovic

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computer methods and programs in biomedicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Automatic Identification of Depression Using Facial Images with Deep Convolutional Neural Network.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Branimir LjubicCenter for Data Analytics and Biomedical Informatics (DABI), Temple University, 1925 N 12th Street, SERC 035-02, Philadelphia, PA 19122, USA.
Shoumik RoychoudhuryCenter for Data Analytics and Biomedical Informatics (DABI), Temple University, 1925 N 12th Street, SERC 035-02, Philadelphia, PA 19122, USA.
Xi Hang CaoCenter for Data Analytics and Biomedical Informatics (DABI), Temple University, 1925 N 12th Street, SERC 035-02, Philadelphia, PA 19122, USA.
Martin PavlovskiCenter for Data Analytics and Biomedical Informatics (DABI), Temple University, 1925 N 12th Street, SERC 035-02, Philadelphia, PA 19122, USA.
Stefan ObradovicDepartment of Computer Science, Brendan Iribe Center for Computer Science and Engineering, University of Maryland, 8125 Paint Branch Drive, College Park, MD 20742, USA.
Richard NairIQVIA, Plymouth Meeting, PA 19462, USA.
Lucas GlassIQVIA, Plymouth Meeting, PA 19462, USA.
Zoran ObradovicCenter for Data Analytics and Biomedical Informatics (DABI), Temple University, 1925 N 12th Street, SERC 035-02, Philadelphia, PA 19122, USA. Electronic address: zoran.obradovic@temple.edu.
Temple University · USIQVIA (United States) · USUniversity of Maryland, College Park · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectiveAlzheimer's disease (AD) is the most common type of dementia that can seriously affect a person's ability to perform daily activities. Estimates indicate that AD may rank third as a cause of death for older people, after heart disease and cancer. Identification of individuals at risk for developing AD is imperative for testing therapeutic interventions. The objective of the study was to determine could diagnostics of AD from EMR data alone (without relying on diagnostic imaging) be significantly improved by applying clinical domain knowledge in data preprocessing and positive dataset selection rather than setting naïve filters.

methodsData were extracted from the repository of heterogeneous ambulatory EMR data, collected from primary care medical offices all over the U.S. Medical domain knowledge was applied to build a positive dataset from data relevant to AD. Selected Clinically Relevant Positive (SCRP) datasets were used as inputs to a Long-Short-Term Memory (LSTM) Recurrent Neural Network (RNN) deep learning model to predict will the patient develop AD.

resultsRisk scores prediction of AD using the drugs domain information in an SCRP AD dataset of 2,324 patients achieved high out-of-sample score - 0.98-0.99 Area Under the Precision-Recall Curve (AUPRC) when using 90% of SCRP dataset for training. AUPRC dropped to 0.89 when training the model using less than 1,500 cases from the SCRP dataset. The model was still significantly better than when using naïve dataset selection.

conclusionThe LSTM RNN method that used data relevant to AD performed significantly better when learning from the SCRP dataset than when datasets were selected naïvely. The integration of qualitative medical knowledge for dataset selection and deep learning technology provided a mechanism for significant improvement of AD prediction. Accurate and early prediction of AD is significant in the identification of patients for clinical trials, which can possibly result in the discovery of new drugs for treatments of AD. Also, the contribution of the proposed predictions of AD is a better selection of patients who need imaging diagnostics for differential diagnosis of AD from other degenerative brain disorders.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseDeep LearningAgedAged, 80 and overArea Under CurveHumansNeural Networks, ComputerAlzheimer's disease predictionCognitive impairmentDeep learningElectronic medical recordsRecurrent Neural Networks

Identifiers

PMID33011665
PMCPMC7502243
OpenAlexW3088921056

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.