ReviewCurrent opinion in biotechnology2020
Engineered biomaterials for heart disease.
Review in Current opinion in biotechnology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- Chitosan-Based Scaffolds for the Treatment of Myocardial Infarction: A Systematic Review.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Pooled it
- Decellularized extracellular matrix materials for treatment of ischemic cardiomyopathy.Bioactive materials · 2024Review
- Design Strategies and Application Potential of Multifunctional Hydrogels for Promoting Angiogenesis.International journal of nanomedicine · 2024Review
- Microfluidic encapsulation of photosynthetic cyanobacteria in hydrogel microparticles augments oxygen delivery to rescue ischemic myocardium.Journal of bioscience and bioengineering · 2023Article
- Contemporary Challenges of Regenerative Therapy in Patients with Ischemic and Non-Ischemic Heart Failure.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2022Review
- Taking It Personally: 3D Bioprinting a Patient-Specific Cardiac Patch for the Treatment of Heart Failure.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Bioengineering approaches to treat the failing heart: from cell biology to 3D printing.Nature reviews. Cardiology · 2022Review
- 3D Electrospun Synthetic Extracellular Matrix for Tissue Regeneration.Small science · 2021Article
- Aragonite-Polylysine: Neuro-Regenerative Scaffolds with Diverse Effects on Astrogliosis.Polymers · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Ischemic heart disease is the most common type of heart disease, responsible for roughly 10 million deaths worldwide annually. While standard clinical interventions have resulted in improved patient outcomes, access to small diameter vessels required for cardiovascular interventions, and long-term patient mortality rates associated with eventual heart failure, remain critical challenges. In this current opinion piece we discuss novel methodologies for the advancement of vascular grafts, cardiac patches, and injectable drug delivery depot technologies as they relate to treatment of ischemic heart disease, including bilayered conduits, acellular bioactive extracellular matrix (ECM) scaffolds, and protease-responsive hydrogel delivery platforms. We address the motivation for innovation and current limitations in the field of engineered biomaterials for myocardial ischemia therapeutics and interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.