Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33011390›Full record

ArticleJournal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer2021

A 10-Year Cross-Sectional Analysis of Public, Oncologist, and Patient Attitudes About Lung Cancer and Associated Stigma.

Maureen Rigney, Eleni Rapsomaniki, Lisa Carter-Harris, Jennifer C King

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Interventions to Reduce Lung Cancer and COPD-Related Stigma: A Systematic Review.Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Reducing Stigma in Lung Cancer Screening: Co-Design of a Targeted Resource for Health Professionals in Australia.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Stigma and related influencing factors in brain cancer patients: a cross-sectional study and parallel mediation analysis.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Article
  12. Cancer stigma: the need for policy and programmatic action.Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs · 2024
    Article
  13. Examining evidence of lung cancer stigma among health-care trainees.Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Lung Cancer Stigma Then and Now: Continued Challenges Amid a Landscape of Progress.Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer · 2021
    Article
  20. Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics, 2025.CA: a cancer journal for clinicians
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Maureen RigneyGO(2) Foundation for Lung Cancer, Washington, District of Columbia.
Eleni RapsomanikiAstraZeneca, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Lisa Carter-HarrisDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Jennifer C KingGO(2) Foundation for Lung Cancer, Washington, District of Columbia. Electronic address: jking@go2foundation.org.
AstraZeneca (United Kingdom) · GBMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionLung cancer stigma negatively impacts the clinical care and outcomes of those diagnosed, resulting in enduring disparities. The objective of this study was to determine whether attitudes toward lung cancer and the stigmatization of people diagnosed have changed over a decade.

methodsA cross-sectional survey was administered to the general public, oncologists, and people with lung cancer 10 years apart (2008 and 2018) using the same instrument and methodology. The measures of stigma agreement ratings on a five-point Likert scale were compared between 2008 and 2018 for all three sample groups.

resultsIn 2018, a total of 1001 members of the general public, 205 oncologists, and 208 people with lung cancer were enrolled. Improvements were noted over the decade, including the availability of more treatment options. Greater disease awareness was also found, with 94% of the public reporting knowledge of lung cancer (versus 82.5% in 2008, p < 0.0001). However, no change was found in the percentage of the public reporting that patients with lung cancer are at least partially to blame for their illness (60.3% in 2018). In 2018, more people with lung cancer agreed there is a stigma associated with lung cancer (72.1 versus 54.5%, p < 0.001) and that those diagnosed are viewed or treated differently by society in general (69.4% versus 50.8%, p < 0.001).

conclusionsThe results reflect recognition of treatment gains and increased visibility of lung cancer but also highlight that stigma remains a significant problem. Of critical importance to the care of those diagnosed was the unexpected increase in stigma reported by the patient population.

Indexed as

Lung NeoplasmsOncologistsAttitudeCross-Sectional StudiesHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansSocial StigmaSurveys and QuestionnairesLung cancerQuality of LifeStigmaSurvivorship

Identifiers

PMID33011390
PMCPMC8355604
OpenAlexW3091111919

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.