Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33011151›Full record

ArticleEuropean urology focus2021

European Association of Urology Urolithiasis Guidelines: Where Are We Going?

Lazaros Tzelves, Christian Türk, Andreas Skolarikos

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European urology focus, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 116 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. [Association between Chinese visceral adiposity index and the risk of nephrolithiasis].Zhejiang da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Zhejiang University. Medical sciences · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lazaros TzelvesSecond Department of Urology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Sismanogleio General Hospital, Athens, Greece.
Christian TürkDepartment of Urology, Hospital of the Sisters of Charity, Urologische Praxis mit Steinzentrum, Vienna, Austria.
Andreas SkolarikosSecond Department of Urology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Sismanogleio General Hospital, Athens, Greece. Electronic address: andskol@yahoo.com.
National and Kapodistrian University of Athens · GR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Urolithiasis is a clinical condition showing increasing trends, especially among European and other developed countries. The European Association of Urology (EAU), in close collaboration with experts in the field, publishes a yearly updated clinical guideline, in order to provide practicing urologists around Europe and the rest of the world a tool for optimizing patient care and decision-making. The methodological approach for developing this guide is quite rigorous and follows rigorous scientific standards. The challenges that a urologist faces are increasing; therefore, during meticulous literature search, the EAU Urolithiasis Panel identifies gaps in knowledge and conducts systematic reviews, in order to provide answers or to propose ideas for designing future research. This way, a new section was published last year, regarding diagnosis and management of bladder stones, with more systematic reviews on the way. The aim of this study is to analyze current structure and goals of the EAU Urolithiasis Panel, along with future ambitions and challenges. PATIENT SUMMARY: Increasing trends in kidney stone disease along with developments in technology necessitate systematic organization of information for urologists in order to be able to follow diagnostic and therapeutic algorithms for optimizing patient care. The role of the European Association of Urology Urolithiasis Guideline Panel is to provide such a tool by development of urolithiasis guidelines on an annual basis.

Indexed as

Guidelines as TopicUrolithiasisUrologyEuropeHumansSocieties, MedicalBladder stonesEuropean Association of UrologyEuropean Association of Urology Urolithiasis PanelGuidelinesSystematic reviewUrolithiasis

Identifiers

PMID33011151
OpenAlexW3089715081

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.