ArticleAmerican heart journal2020
Cardiac safety research consortium "shock II" think tank report: Advancing practical approaches to generating evidence for the treatment of cardiogenic shock.
Article in American heart journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Acute Massive Pulmonary Embolism: a Meta-Analysis and Call to Action.Journal of cardiovascular translational research · 2022Pooled it
- Article
- Fluid balance trajectories and prognosis in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: a group-based trajectory model approach.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
- Machine learning-based prediction of mortality in acute myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Article
- Research Priorities in Critical Care Cardiology: JACC Expert Panel.Journal of the American College of Cardiology · 2023Review
- Treatment Intensity for the Management of Cardiogenic Shock: Comparison Between STEMI and Non-STEMI.JACC. Advances · 2023Article
- Improving Survival in Cardiogenic Shock-A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of the Impact of an Institutional Allocation Protocol to Short-Term Mechanical Circulatory Support.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Position Statement on Vascular Access Safety for Percutaneous Devices in AMI Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock.JACC. Cardiovascular interventions · 2022Review
- Hemodynamic-based Assessment and Management of Cardiogenic Shock.US cardiology · 2022Review
- Contemporary Management of Cardiogenic Shock: A RAND Appropriateness Panel Approach.Circulation. Heart failure · 2021Article
- Review
- Blood urea nitrogen and in-hospital mortality in critically ill patients with MI or cardiogenic shock: Analysis of the MIMIC-IV database.JRSM cardiovascular diseaseArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
29 authors.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.