Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33011085›Full record

ArticleReproductive biomedicine online2020

Blasts from the past: is morphology useful in PGT-A tested and untested frozen embryo transfers?

Matthew A Shear, Denis A Vaughan, Anna M Modest, Emily A Seidler, Angela Q Leung, Michele R Hacker, Denny Sakkas, Alan S Penzias

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Reproductive biomedicine online, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy: predictive embryonic factors.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Matthew A ShearDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston MA, USA; Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston MA, USA.
Denis A VaughanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston MA, USA; Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston MA, USA; Boston IVF, 103 2nd Avenue, Waltham MA, USA.
Anna M ModestDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston MA, USA; Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston MA, USA.
Emily A SeidlerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston MA, USA; Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston MA, USA; Boston IVF, 103 2nd Avenue, Waltham MA, USA.
Angela Q LeungDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston MA, USA; Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston MA, USA; Boston IVF, 103 2nd Avenue, Waltham MA, USA.
Michele R HackerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston MA, USA; Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston MA, USA.
Denny SakkasBoston IVF, 103 2nd Avenue, Waltham MA, USA.
Alan S PenziasDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston MA, USA; Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston MA, USA; Boston IVF, 103 2nd Avenue, Waltham MA, USA. Electronic address: apenzias@bostonivf.com.
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center · USBoston IVF · US

Funding

Harvard Clinical and Translational Science CenterUL1TR001102 · NCATS · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI NADLER, LEE MARSHALL · 2013 to 2017
$106.2M
The Harvard Clinical and Translational Science CenterUL1TR002541 · NCATS · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI NADLER, LEE MARSHALL · 2018 to 2022
$93.0M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001102NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002541
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

research questionDay of cryopreservation, inner cell mass (ICM) grade, trophectoderm grade and blastocyst expansion grade have been associated with differences in live birth rate in frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycles. This study sought to examine the likelihood of live birth and whether the morphological grade of the blastocyst is more or equally useful in FET cycles among preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies (PGT-A) tested and untested blastocysts.

designThis was a retrospective cohort study of 6271 vitrified-warmed, autologous, single-embryo transfer cycles among patients undergoing IVF from July 2013 to December 2017 at a single, university-affiliated infertility practice. The primary outcome was live birth, calculated by generalized estimating equations.

resultsAmong PGT-A tested embryos, inferior ICM grade was associated with a lower chance of live birth (ICM grade B versus A: adjusted risk ratio [aRR] 0.91, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.84-0.99). Among untested blastocysts there was a lower live birth rate in blastocysts cryopreserved on day 6 versus day 5 (aRR 0.87, 95% CI 0.78-0.96), and those with inferior pre-vitrification trophectoderm grade (trophectoderm grade B versus A: aRR 0.86, 95% CI 0.79-0.94). Blastocysts with a higher pre-vitrification expansion grade (pre-vitrification expansion grade 5 versus 4: aRR 1.1, 95% CI 1.01-1.2) were associated, but ICM grade was not associated (ICM grade B versus A: aRR 0.93, 95% CI 0.86-1.02), with chance of live birth.

conclusionsAmong PGT-A untested blastocysts, assessing embryo quality by day of cryopreservation, trophectoderm grade and expansion grade may help to identify embryos with the highest likelihood of live birth. Identifying euploid embryos by PGT-A appears to homogenize the cohort, making blastocyst morphological grade and day of cryopreservation less important.

Indexed as

AdultAneuploidyBlastocystCell ShapeCohort StudiesCryopreservationEmbryo TransferFemaleGenetic TestingHumansInfant, NewbornMalePregnancyPregnancy OutcomePreimplantation DiagnosisRetrospective StudiesBlastocyst morphologyFrozen embryo transferInner cell massPreimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies (PGT-A)Trophectoderm

Identifiers

PMID33011085
PMCPMC7872471
OpenAlexW3045260166

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.