Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33010740›Full record

ArticleCortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior2020

Changes in visual cortical processing attenuate singleton distraction during visual search.

Bo-Yeong Won, Martha Forloines, Zhiheng Zhou, Joy J Geng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Rapid Inversion of Singleton Distractor Representations Underlies Learned Attentional Suppression.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Learning Modulates Early Encephalographic Responses to Distracting Stimuli: A Combined SSVEP and ERP Study.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Time Courses of Attended and Ignored Object Representations.Journal of cognitive neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  16. Priming of probabilistic attentional templates.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2023
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. History Modulates Early Sensory Processing of Salient Distractors.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Bo-Yeong WonCenter for Mind and Brain, University of California, Davis 267 Cousteau Pl., Davis, CA, 95618, USA. Electronic address: bywon@ucdavis.edu.
Martha ForloinesDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Davis 1 Shields Ave, Davis, CA, 95616, USA; Department of Neurology, University of California, Davis 3160 Folsom Blvd, Sacramento, CA, 95816, USA.
Zhiheng ZhouCenter for Mind and Brain, University of California, Davis 267 Cousteau Pl., Davis, CA, 95618, USA.
Joy J GengCenter for Mind and Brain, University of California, Davis 267 Cousteau Pl., Davis, CA, 95618, USA; Department of Psychology, University of California, Davis 1 Shields Ave, Davis, CA, 95616, USA. Electronic address: jgeng@ucdavis.edu.

Funding

Quantifying the attentional templateR01MH113855 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI GENG, JOY JIA · 2018 to 2022
$1.9M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH113855
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ability to suppress distractions is essential to successful completion of goal-directed behaviors. Several behavioral studies have recently provided strong evidence that learned suppression may be particularly efficient in reducing distractor interference. Expectations about a distractor's repeated location, color, or even presence are rapidly learned and used to attenuate interference. In this study, we use a visual search paradigm in which a color singleton, which is known to capture attention, occurs within blocks with high or low frequency. The behavioral results show reduced singleton interference during the high compared to the low frequency block (Won et al., 2019). The fMRI results provide evidence that the attenuation of distractor interference is supported by changes in singleton, target, and non-salient distractor representations within retinotopic visual cortex. These changes in visual cortex are accompanied by findings that singleton-present trials compared to non-singleton trials produce greater activation in bilateral parietal cortex, indicative of attentional capture, in low frequency, but not high frequency blocks. Together, these results suggest that the readout of saliency signals associated with an expected color singleton from visual cortex is suppressed, resulting in less competition for attentional priority in frontoparietal attentional control regions.

Indexed as

Pattern Recognition, VisualVisual CortexAttentionHumansParietal LobeReaction TimeVisual PerceptionFunctional magnetic resonance imagingMVPASingleton distractionVisual cortexVisual search

Identifiers

PMID33010740
PMCPMC7655700

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.