Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33010730›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of medical informatics2020

A deep learning solution to recommend laboratory reduction strategies in ICU.

Lishan Yu, Linda Li, Elmer Bernstam, Xiaoqian Jiang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of medical informatics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Building the Model.Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine · 2023
    Review
  3. Confidence-based laboratory test reduction recommendation algorithm.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lishan YuSchool of Biomedical Informatics, UTHealth, United States; Department of Mathematical Sciences, Tsinghua University, China.
Linda LiDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, McGovern Medical School, UTHealth, United States.
Elmer BernstamSchool of Biomedical Informatics, UTHealth, United States; Division of General Internal Medicine, McGovern Medical School, UTHealth, United States.
Xiaoqian JiangSchool of Biomedical Informatics, UTHealth, United States. Electronic address: xiaoqian.jiang@uth.tmc.edu.

Funding

Open Health Natural Language Processing CollaboratoryU01TR002062 · NCATS · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI JIANG, XIAOQIAN, LIU, HONGFANG · 2017 to 2021
$7.6M
SHARE: Statistical Health Information Release with Differential PrivacyR01GM114612 · NIGMS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI XIONG, LI · 2015 to 2017
$1.0M
NCATS NIH HHS U01 TR002062NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM114612
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo build a machine-learning model that predicts laboratory test results and provides a promising lab test reduction strategy, using spatial-temporal correlations. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe developed a global prediction model to treat laboratory testing as a series of decisions by considering contextual information over time and across modalities. We validated our method using a critical care database (MIMIC III), which includes 4,570,709 observations of 12 standard laboratory tests, among 38,773 critical care patients. Our deep-learning model made real-time laboratory reduction recommendations and predicted the properties of lab tests, including values, normal/abnormal (whether labs were within the normal range) and transition (normal to abnormal or abnormal to normal from the latest lab test). We reported area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for predicting normal/abnormal, evaluated accuracy and absolute bias on prediction vs. observation against lab test reduction proportion. We compared our model against baseline models and analyzed the impact of variations on the recommended reduction strategy.

resultsOur best model offered a 20.26 % reduction in the number of laboratory tests. By applying the recommended reduction policy on the hold-out dataset (7755 patients), our model predicted normality/abnormality of laboratory tests with a 98.27 % accuracy (AUC, 0.9885; sensitivity, 97.84 %; specificity, 98.80 %; PPV, 99.01 %; NPV, 97.39 %) on 20.26 % reduced lab tests, and recommended 98.10 % of transitions to be checked. Our model performed better than the greedy models, and the recommended reduction strategy was robust. DISCUSSION: Strong spatial and temporal correlations between laboratory tests can be used to optimize policies for reducing laboratory tests throughout the hospital course. Our method allows for iterative predictions and provides a superior solution for the dynamic decision-making laboratory reduction problem.

conclusionThis work demonstrates a machine-learning model that assists physicians in determining which laboratory tests may be omitted.

Indexed as

Deep LearningHumansIntensive Care UnitsLaboratoriesMachine LearningROC CurveDeep learningDynamic decision-making problemLaboratory test reduction

Identifiers

PMID33010730
PMCPMC10777357

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.