ArticleBiosensors & bioelectronics2020
An integrated system of air sampling and simultaneous enrichment for rapid biosensing of airborne coronavirus and influenza virus.
Article in Biosensors & bioelectronics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development of a Platform forAerosol science and technology : the journal of the American Association for Aerosol Research · 2026Article
- Development of a Novel Electrostatic-Based Bioaerosol Sampler.Micromachines · 2024Article
- Causal mediation analysis with mediator values below an assay limit.Statistics in medicine · 2024Article
- Research advances in microfluidic collection and detection of virus, bacterial, and fungal bioaerosols.Mikrochimica acta · 2024Review
- On-site airborne pathogen detection for infection risk mitigation.Chemical Society reviews · 2023Review
- Emerging Infectious Diseases Are Virulent Viruses-Are We Prepared? An Overview.Microorganisms · 2023Review
- Trends of respiratory virus detection in point-of-care testing: A review.Analytica chimica acta · 2023Review
- Mechanisms, Techniques and Devices of Airborne Virus Detection: A Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Review
- Research progress of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 on aerosol collection and detection.Chinese chemical letters = Zhongguo hua xue kuai bao · 2023Review
- Manipulation, Sampling and Inactivation of the SARS-CoV-2 Virus Using Nonuniform Electric Fields on Micro-Fabricated Platforms: A Review.Micromachines · 2023Review
- On-site bioaerosol sampling and detection in microfluidic platforms.Trends in analytical chemistry : TRAC · 2023Review
- Smartphone-Based Multiplexed Biosensing Tools for Health Monitoring.Biosensors · 2022Review
- SARS-CoV-2 and other airborne respiratory viruses in outdoor aerosols in three Swiss cities before and during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic.Environment international · 2022Article
- A Smart System for the Contactless Measurement of Energy Expenditure.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Biosensor detection of airborne respiratory viruses such as SARS-CoV-2.SLAS technology · 2022Review
- Viral outbreaks detection and surveillance using wastewater-based epidemiology, viral air sampling, and machine learning techniques: A comprehensive review and outlook.The Science of the total environment · 2022Review
- Indoor Air Quality including Respiratory Viruses.Toxics · 2021Article
- Recent advancements in the measurement of pathogenic airborne viruses.Journal of hazardous materials · 2021Review
- Review
- Reusable surface amplified nanobiosensor for the sub PFU/mL level detection of airborne virus.Scientific reports · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Point-of-care risk assessment (PCRA) for airborne viruses requires a system that can enrich low-concentration airborne viruses dispersed in field environments into a small volume of liquid. In this study, airborne virus particles were collected to a degree above the limit of detection (LOD) for a real-time quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR). This study employed an electrostatic air sampler to capture aerosolized test viruses (human coronavirus 229E (HCoV-229E), influenza A virus subtype H1N1 (A/H1N1), and influenza A virus subtype H3N2 (A/H3N2)) in a continuously flowing liquid (aerosol-to-hydrosol (ATH) enrichment) and a concanavalin A (ConA)-coated magnetic particles (CMPs)-installed fluidic channel for simultaneous hydrosol-to-hydrosol (HTH) enrichment. The air sampler's ATH enrichment capacity (EC) was evaluated using the aerosol counting method. In contrast, the HTH EC for the ATH-collected sample was evaluated using transmission-electron-microscopy (TEM)-based image analysis and real-time qRT-PCR assay. For example, the ATH EC for HCoV-229E was up to 67,000, resulting in a viral concentration of 0.08 PFU/mL (in a liquid sample) for a viral epidemic scenario of 1.2 PFU/m
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.