Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33010659›Full record

ArticleHealth & place2020

Participatory research in Northwest Atlanta's Proctor Creek Watershed: Using photovoice to explore environmental health risks at the water's edge.

Na'Taki Osborne Jelks, Donna J Smith-Perry, Christina H Fuller, Christine Stauber

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health & place, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Photovoice Reveals Residents' Concerns for Air and Water Quality in Industry-Impacted Rural Community.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Na'Taki Osborne JelksEnvironmental and Health Sciences Program, Spelman College, 350 Spelman Lane SW, Box 235, Atlanta, GA, 30314, USA; Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Public Health, Georgia State University, P.O. Box 3995, GA, 30302-3995, USA. Electronic address: nosborne@spelman.edu.
Donna J Smith-PerryDepartment of Health Policy and Behavioral Sciences, School of Public Health, Georgia State University, P.O. Box 3995, GA, 30302-3995, USA. Electronic address: donnajsmith@gsu.edu.
Christina H FullerDepartment of Population Health Sciences, School of Public Health, Georgia State University, P.O. Box 3995, GA, 30302-3995, USA. Electronic address: cfuller@gsu.edu.
Christine StauberDepartment of Population Health Sciences, School of Public Health, Georgia State University, P.O. Box 3995, GA, 30302-3995, USA. Electronic address: cstauber@gsu.edu.
Georgia State University · US

Funding

Pilot Project ProgramP30ES019776 · NIEHS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI William Michael Caudle · 2013 to 2026
$22.6M
NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES019776
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study we used a participatory research method, photovoice, to explore community perceptions about environmental health risks, community assets, and strengths in and around an urban, degraded watershed in Northwest Atlanta, Georgia. This watershed, formed by Proctor Creek, is a focal point for redevelopment and infrastructure investments for years to come. Using a community-based participatory research approach, 10 Proctor Creek residents (watershed researchers), and a university partner, engaged in data collection; participatory data analysis; internal discussions; translation of research findings into watershed restoration, community revitalization, remedial action, and policy solutions; and dissemination of results to fellow watershed residents, stakeholders, and decision makers. We present a conceptual model linking the watershed researchers' understanding of urban policies and practice in the Proctor Creek Watershed to environmental, neighborhood and housing conditions and their influence on health outcomes and quality of life. Engaging community members in defining their own community environmental health challenges and assets yielded the following primary themes: 1) threats to the natural environment, 2) built environment stressors that influence health, 3) blight and divestment of public resources, and 4) hope for the future. Residents' vision for the future of the watershed - a restored creek, revitalized neighborhoods, and restored people - is fueled by a strong connection to history, memory, and sense of place. We demonstrate the value of local knowledge in identifying previously unaddressed environmental health risks in the Proctor Creek Watershed as well as solutions to reduce or eliminate them.

Indexed as

Community-Based Participatory ResearchQuality of LifeEnvironmental HealthHumansResidence CharacteristicsWaterWaterAtlanta, GACommunity-based participatory research (CBPR)Environmental healthEnvironmental justicePhotovoiceProctor Creek

Identifiers

PMID33010659
PMCPMC9138091
OpenAlexW3089580854

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.