Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33010425›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomedical informatics2020

Multi-Ontology Refined Embeddings (MORE): A hybrid multi-ontology and corpus-based semantic representation model for biomedical concepts.

Steven Jiang, Weiyi Wu, Naofumi Tomita, Craig Ganoe, Saeed Hassanpour

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomedical informatics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Steven JiangDepartment of Computer Science, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH 03755, USA.
Weiyi WuDepartment of Biomedical Data Science, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH 03755, USA.
Naofumi TomitaDepartment of Biomedical Data Science, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH 03755, USA.
Craig GanoeDepartment of Biomedical Data Science, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH 03755, USA.
Saeed HassanpourDepartment of Computer Science, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH 03755, USA; Department of Biomedical Data Science, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH 03755, USA; Department of Epidemiology, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH 03755, USA. Electronic address: Saeed.Hassanpour@dartmouth.edu.

Funding

Translational Engineering in Cancer (TEC)P30CA023108 · NCI · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI Steven D Leach · 1985 to 2026
$91.3M
Clinicopathologic and Genetic Profiling through Machine Learning and Natural Language Processing for Precision Lung Cancer ManagementR01CA249758 · NCI · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI HASSANPOUR, SAEED · 2019 to 2022
$1.5M
Improving Colorectal Cancer Screening and Risk Assessment through Deep Learning on Medical Images and RecordsR01LM012837 · NLM · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI HASSANPOUR, SAEED · 2019 to 2022
$1.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA023108NCI NIH HHS R01 CA249758NLM NIH HHS R01 LM012837
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveCurrently, a major limitation for natural language processing (NLP) analyses in clinical applications is that concepts are not effectively referenced in various forms across different texts. This paper introduces Multi-Ontology Refined Embeddings (MORE), a novel hybrid framework that incorporates domain knowledge from multiple ontologies into a distributional semantic model, learned from a corpus of clinical text. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe use the RadCore and MIMIC-III free-text datasets for the corpus-based component of MORE. For the ontology-based part, we use the Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) ontology and three state-of-the-art ontology-based similarity measures. In our approach, we propose a new learning objective, modified from the sigmoid cross-entropy objective function. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: We used two established datasets of semantic similarities among biomedical concept pairs to evaluate the quality of the generated word embeddings. On the first dataset with 29 concept pairs, with similarity scores established by physicians and medical coders, MORE's similarity scores have the highest combined correlation (0.633), which is 5.0% higher than that of the baseline model, and 12.4% higher than that of the best ontology-based similarity measure. On the second dataset with 449 concept pairs, MORE's similarity scores have a correlation of 0.481, based on the average of four medical residents' similarity ratings, and that outperforms the skip-gram model by 8.1%, and the best ontology measure by 6.9%. Furthermore, MORE outperforms three pre-trained transformer-based word embedding models (i.e., BERT, ClinicalBERT, and BioBERT) on both datasets.

conclusionMORE incorporates knowledge from several biomedical ontologies into an existing corpus-based distributional semantics model, improving both the accuracy of the learned word embeddings and the extensibility of the model to a broader range of biomedical concepts. MORE allows for more accurate clustering of concepts across a wide range of applications, such as analyzing patient health records to identify subjects with similar pathologies, or integrating heterogeneous clinical data to improve interoperability between hospitals.

Indexed as

Biological OntologiesNatural Language ProcessingSemanticsCluster AnalysisHumansMedical Subject HeadingsBiomedical OntologyBiomedical Semantic RepresentationDistributional SemanticsSemantic Similarity

Identifiers

PMID33010425
PMCPMC7665985

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.