Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33010154›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2021

CRISP-view: a database of functional genetic screens spanning multiple phenotypes.

Yingbo Cui, Xiaolong Cheng, Qing Chen, Bicna Song, Anthony Chiu, Yuan Gao, Tyson Dawson, Lumen Chao, Wubing Zhang, Dian Li and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Potential promising of synthetic lethality in cancer research and treatment.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2025
    Review
  5. CRISPR-Cas9 applications in T cells and adoptive T cell therapies.Cellular & molecular biology letters · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. 3Bs of CRISPR-Cas mediated genome editing in plants: exploring the basics, bioinformatics and biosafety landscape.Physiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology · 2023
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. A new era in functional genomics screens.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2022
    Review
  12. High-content CRISPR screening.Nature reviews. Methods primers · 2022
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. AnSTAR protocols · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Yingbo CuiSanyi Road, Changsha, Hunan Province, People's Republic of China.
Xiaolong ChengCenter for Genetic Medicine Research, Children's National Hospital. 111 Michigan Ave NW, Washington, DC 20010, USA.
Qing ChenCenter for Genetic Medicine Research, Children's National Hospital. 111 Michigan Ave NW, Washington, DC 20010, USA.
Bicna SongCenter for Genetic Medicine Research, Children's National Hospital. 111 Michigan Ave NW, Washington, DC 20010, USA.
Anthony ChiuCenter for Genetic Medicine Research, Children's National Hospital. 111 Michigan Ave NW, Washington, DC 20010, USA.
Yuan GaoCenter for Genetic Medicine Research, Children's National Hospital. 111 Michigan Ave NW, Washington, DC 20010, USA.
Tyson DawsonCenter for Genetic Medicine Research, Children's National Hospital. 111 Michigan Ave NW, Washington, DC 20010, USA.
Lumen ChaoCenter for Genetic Medicine Research, Children's National Hospital. 111 Michigan Ave NW, Washington, DC 20010, USA.
Wubing ZhangDepartment of Data Sciences, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health. 450 Brookline Ave., Boston MA 02215, USA.
Dian LiDepartment of Data Sciences, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health. 450 Brookline Ave., Boston MA 02215, USA.
Zexiang ZengDepartment of Data Sciences, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health. 450 Brookline Ave., Boston MA 02215, USA.
Jijun YuBeijing Key Laboratory of Therapeutic Gene Engineering Antibody. Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Zexu LiCollege of Life and Health Sciences, Northeastern University. 110819 Shenyang, People's Republic of China.
Teng FeiCollege of Life and Health Sciences, Northeastern University. 110819 Shenyang, People's Republic of China.
Shaoliang PengLushan South Road, Changsha, Hunan Province, People's Republic of China.
Wei LiCenter for Genetic Medicine Research, Children's National Hospital. 111 Michigan Ave NW, Washington, DC 20010, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High-throughput genetic screening based on CRISPR/Cas9 or RNA-interference (RNAi) enables the exploration of genes associated with the phenotype of interest on a large scale. The rapid accumulation of public available genetic screening data provides a wealth of knowledge about genotype-to-phenotype relationships and a valuable resource for the systematic analysis of gene functions. Here we present CRISP-view, a comprehensive database of CRISPR/Cas9 and RNAi screening datasets that span multiple phenotypes, including in vitro and in vivo cell proliferation and viability, response to cancer immunotherapy, virus response, protein expression, etc. By 22 September 2020, CRISP-view has collected 10 321 human samples and 825 mouse samples from 167 papers. All the datasets have been curated, annotated, and processed by a standard MAGeCK-VISPR analysis pipeline with quality control (QC) metrics. We also developed a user-friendly webserver to visualize, explore, and search these datasets. The webserver is freely available at http://crispview.weililab.org.

Indexed as

Databases, GeneticGenetic TestingCRISPR-Cas SystemsMetadataMolecular Sequence AnnotationPhenotypeUser-Computer Interface

Identifiers

PMID33010154
PMCPMC7778972

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.