Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33010115›Full record

ArticleJournal of midwifery & women's health2020

Building a Global Evidence Base to Guide Policy and Implementation for Group Antenatal Care in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: Key Principles and Research Framework Recommendations from the Global Group Antenatal Care Collaborative.

Lindsay Grenier, Jody R Lori, Blair G Darney, Lisa Miyako Noguchi, Sheela Maru, Carrie Klima, Tiffany Lundeen, Dilys Walker, Crystal L Patil, Stephanie Suhowatsky and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of midwifery & women's health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Lindsay GrenierMaternal and Newborn Health, Jhpiego, Baltimore, Maryland.
Jody R LoriDepartment of Health Behavior and Biological Science, School of Nursing, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Blair G DarneyDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon.
Lisa Miyako NoguchiMaternal and Newborn Health, Jhpiego, Baltimore, Maryland.
Sheela MaruDepartment of Health Systems Design and Global Health, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.
Carrie KlimaDepartment of Women, Children, and Family Health Sciences, College of Nursing, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
Tiffany LundeenInstitute for Global Health Sciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7039-6253
Dilys WalkerInstitute for Global Health Sciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Crystal L PatilDepartment of Women, Children, and Family Health Sciences, College of Nursing, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4536-4599
Stephanie SuhowatskyMaternal and Newborn Health, Jhpiego, Baltimore, Maryland.
Sabine MusangeUniversity of Rwanda, School of Public Health, Kigali, Rwanda.

Funding

Group Antenatal Care: Effectiveness for Maternal/Infant and HIV Prevention Outcomes and Contextual Factors Linked to Implementation Success in MalawiR01NR018115 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI NORR, KATHLEEN F, PATIL, CRYSTAL LAUREN · 2018 to 2022
$3.1M
Integrating HIV with Innovative Group Antenatal Care in Two African CountriesR21NR014413 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI PATIL, CRYSTAL LAUREN · 2013 to 2014
$388k
Conditional Cash Transfers to Prevent Sexually Transmitted Infections in MexicoK01TW008016 · FIC · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI GALARRAGA, OMAR · 2008 to 2010
$348k
FIC NIH HHS K01 TW008016NINR NIH HHS R01 NR018115NINR NIH HHS R21 NR014413
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Evidence from high-income countries suggests that group antenatal care, an alternative service delivery model, may be an effective strategy for improving both the provision and experience of care. Until recently, published research about group antenatal care did not represent findings from low- and middle-income countries, which have health priorities, system challenges, and opportunities that are different than those in high-income countries. Because high-quality evidence is limited, the World Health Organization recommends group antenatal care be implemented only in the context of rigorous research. In 2016 the Global Group Antenatal Care Collaborative was formed as a platform for group antenatal care researchers working in low- and middle-income countries to share experiences and shape future research to accelerate development of a robust global evidence base reflecting implementation and outcomes specific to low- and middle-income countries. This article presents a brief history of the Collaborative's work to date, proposes a common definition and key principles for group antenatal care, and recommends an evaluation and reporting framework for group antenatal care research.

Indexed as

Developing CountriesGroup ProcessesHealth PolicyEvidence-Based PracticeFemaleHumansPregnancyPrenatal CareQuality ImprovementQuality of Health Careantepartum careCentering Pregnancy/group careglobal health/internationalpublic healthquality improvement

Identifiers

PMID33010115
PMCPMC9022023

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.