Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33010101›Full record

ArticleMolecular ecology resources2021

Chromosome-level genome assembly of Paralithodes platypus provides insights into evolution and adaptation of king crabs.

Boping Tang, Zhongkai Wang, Qiuning Liu, Zhengfei Wang, Yandong Ren, Huayun Guo, Tingting Qi, Yuetian Li, Huabin Zhang, Senhao Jiang and 17 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular ecology resources, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

27 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.

Boping TangJiangsu Key Laboratory for Bioresources of Saline Soils, Jiangsu Provincial Key Laboratory of Coastal Wetland Bioresources and Environmental Protection, Jiangsu Synthetic Innovation Center for Coastal Bio-agriculture, Yancheng Teachers University, Yancheng, China.
Zhongkai WangCenter for Ecological and Environmental Sciences, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi'an, China.
Qiuning LiuJiangsu Key Laboratory for Bioresources of Saline Soils, Jiangsu Provincial Key Laboratory of Coastal Wetland Bioresources and Environmental Protection, Jiangsu Synthetic Innovation Center for Coastal Bio-agriculture, Yancheng Teachers University, Yancheng, China.
Zhengfei WangJiangsu Key Laboratory for Bioresources of Saline Soils, Jiangsu Provincial Key Laboratory of Coastal Wetland Bioresources and Environmental Protection, Jiangsu Synthetic Innovation Center for Coastal Bio-agriculture, Yancheng Teachers University, Yancheng, China.
Yandong RenCenter for Ecological and Environmental Sciences, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi'an, China.
Huayun GuoJiangsu Key Laboratory for Bioresources of Saline Soils, Jiangsu Provincial Key Laboratory of Coastal Wetland Bioresources and Environmental Protection, Jiangsu Synthetic Innovation Center for Coastal Bio-agriculture, Yancheng Teachers University, Yancheng, China.
Tingting QiJiangsu Key Laboratory for Bioresources of Saline Soils, Jiangsu Provincial Key Laboratory of Coastal Wetland Bioresources and Environmental Protection, Jiangsu Synthetic Innovation Center for Coastal Bio-agriculture, Yancheng Teachers University, Yancheng, China.
Yuetian LiJiangsu Key Laboratory for Bioresources of Saline Soils, Jiangsu Provincial Key Laboratory of Coastal Wetland Bioresources and Environmental Protection, Jiangsu Synthetic Innovation Center for Coastal Bio-agriculture, Yancheng Teachers University, Yancheng, China.
Huabin ZhangJiangsu Key Laboratory for Bioresources of Saline Soils, Jiangsu Provincial Key Laboratory of Coastal Wetland Bioresources and Environmental Protection, Jiangsu Synthetic Innovation Center for Coastal Bio-agriculture, Yancheng Teachers University, Yancheng, China.
Senhao JiangJiangsu Key Laboratory for Bioresources of Saline Soils, Jiangsu Provincial Key Laboratory of Coastal Wetland Bioresources and Environmental Protection, Jiangsu Synthetic Innovation Center for Coastal Bio-agriculture, Yancheng Teachers University, Yancheng, China.
Baoming GeJiangsu Key Laboratory for Bioresources of Saline Soils, Jiangsu Provincial Key Laboratory of Coastal Wetland Bioresources and Environmental Protection, Jiangsu Synthetic Innovation Center for Coastal Bio-agriculture, Yancheng Teachers University, Yancheng, China.
Fujun XuanJiangsu Key Laboratory for Bioresources of Saline Soils, Jiangsu Provincial Key Laboratory of Coastal Wetland Bioresources and Environmental Protection, Jiangsu Synthetic Innovation Center for Coastal Bio-agriculture, Yancheng Teachers University, Yancheng, China.
Yue SunJiangsu Key Laboratory for Bioresources of Saline Soils, Jiangsu Provincial Key Laboratory of Coastal Wetland Bioresources and Environmental Protection, Jiangsu Synthetic Innovation Center for Coastal Bio-agriculture, Yancheng Teachers University, Yancheng, China.
Shusheng SheChina Hong Kong Ecology Consultant Company, Hong Kong, China.
Tin Yam ChanInstitute of Marine Biology, National Taiwan Ocean University, Keelung, Taiwan.
Zhongli ShaInstitute of Oceanology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Qingdao, China.
Hui JiangNational Engineering Laboratory of Marine Germplasm Resources Exploration and Utilization, Zhejiang Ocean University, Zhoushan, China.
Haorong LiCenter for Ecological and Environmental Sciences, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi'an, China.
Wei JiangInstitute of Oceanology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Qingdao, China.
Yanli QinCenter for Ecological and Environmental Sciences, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi'an, China.
Kun WangCenter for Ecological and Environmental Sciences, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi'an, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6059-6529
Qiang QiuCenter for Ecological and Environmental Sciences, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi'an, China.
Wen WangCenter for Ecological and Environmental Sciences, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi'an, China.
Xinzheng LiInstitute of Oceanology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Qingdao, China.
Ngan Kee NgDepartment of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Science, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Daizhen ZhangJiangsu Key Laboratory for Bioresources of Saline Soils, Jiangsu Provincial Key Laboratory of Coastal Wetland Bioresources and Environmental Protection, Jiangsu Synthetic Innovation Center for Coastal Bio-agriculture, Yancheng Teachers University, Yancheng, China.
Yongxin LiCenter for Ecological and Environmental Sciences, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi'an, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9555-1387
Northwestern Polytechnical University · CNYancheng Teachers University · CNChinese Academy of Sciences · CNNational Taiwan Ocean University · TWNational University of Singapore · SGUK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology · GBZhejiang Ocean University · CN

Funding

Jiangsu Agricultural Science and Technology Independent Innovation Fund CX(18)3027National Key R&D Program of China 2019YFD0900404National Natural Science Foundation of China 31672267
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The blue king crab, Paralithodes platypus, which belongs to the family Lithodidae, is a commercially and ecologically important species. However, a high-quality reference genome for the king crab has not yet been reported. Here, we assembled the first chromosome-level blue king crab genome, which contains 104 chromosomes and an N50 length of 51.15 Mb. Furthermore, we determined that the large genome size can be attributed to the insertion of long interspersed nuclear elements and long tandem repeats. Genome assembly assessment showed that 96.54% of the assembled transcripts could be aligned to the assembled genome. Phylogenetic analysis showed the blue king crab to have a close relationship with the Eubrachyura crabs, from which it diverged 272.5 million years ago. Population history analyses indicated that the effective population of the blue king crab declined sharply and then gradually increased from the Cretaceous and Neogene periods, respectively. Furthermore, gene families related to developmental pathways, steroid and thyroid hormone synthesis, and inflammatory regulation were expanded in the genome, suggesting that these genes contributed substantially to the environmental adaptation and unique body plan evolution of the blue king crab. The high-quality reference genome reported here provides a solid molecular basis for further study of the blue king crab's development and environmental adaptation.

Indexed as

Adaptation, BiologicalAnomuraBiological EvolutionAnimalsChromosomesGenomeGenome SizePhylogenyadaptationblue king crabevolutiongenome

Identifiers

PMID33010101
PMCPMC7821229
OpenAlexW3089999049

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.