SynthesisArchives of gynecology and obstetrics2021
Procalcitonin in preterm rupture of membranes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diagnostic tests for the prediction of histological chorioamnionitis and funisitis in pregnant women with preterm premature rupture of membranes: A systematic review.The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology · 2025Pooled it
- Procalcitonin: Infection or Maybe Something More? Noninfectious Causes of Increased Serum Procalcitonin Concentration: Updated Knowledge.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Statement of the Obstetrics and Prenatal Medicine Working Group (AGG - Preterm Birth Section) on "Outpatient Management for Pregnant Women with Preterm Premature Rupture of Membranes (PPROM)".Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde · 2024Article
- The Management of Pregnancy Complicated with the Previable Preterm and Preterm Premature Rupture of the Membranes: What about a Limit of Neonatal Viability?-A Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeEarly detection of infection is of supreme importance in obstetrics; however, during pregnancy it is not reliably predicted by standard laboratory tests. We aimed to determine if procalcitonin (PCT) is a reliable predictor of chorioamnionitis (CA) in women with premature rupture of membranes (PPROM).
methodsAn electronic search of Scopus, ISI, Medline, Embase, ClinicalTrials.gov and the Cochrane Library databases was performed using specified key words. We examined all English and French reports on PCT measurement after admission for PPROM and considered: human studies published between 1990 and 2019; observational studies; and randomized controlled trials. A protocol was determined previously, registered at PROSPERO as CRD42019145464. The eligibility was independently assessed by two researchers and literature search yielded 590 studies; after revision of the titles and abstracts, 46 articles were identified as potentially eligible; eight studies were included in the meta-analysis. Primary data synthesis was performed in Review Manager Version 5.3 and average sensitivity and specificity was calculated using Midas, Stata.
resultsFrom the eight studies included, 335 participants with PPROM were enrolled. Our meta-analysis disclosed that PCT has a poor sensitivity (0.50; 95% CI 0.28-0.73) and a modest specificity (0.72; 95% CI 0.51-0.87) in diagnosing CA. C-reactive protein (CRP) not only has better sensitivity (0.71; 95% CI 0.53-0.84), but also better specificity (0.75; 95% CI 0.55-0.88), compared with the other inflammatory parameters analyzed. Procalcitonin does not seems to be better than CRP in preterm rupture of membranes for chorioamnionitis diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.