Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33009948›Full record

ArticleParasitology research2020

Molecular characterization of Cryptosporidium spp. in minks (Neovison vison), blue foxes (Vulpes lagopus), and raccoon dogs (Nyctereutes procyonoides) in farms from Xinjiang, Northwest China.

Weifeng Qian, Ying Zhang, Yuxi Jiang, Aiyun Zhao, Chaochao Lv, Meng Qi

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Parasitology research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. DivergentFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Article
  3. An Update on ZoonoticAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021
    Review
  4. Zoonotic parasites in farmed exotic animals in China: Implications to public health.International journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Weifeng QianCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Henan University of Science and Technology, Luoyang, 471003, China.
Ying ZhangCollege of Animal Science, Tarim University, Tarim Road 1487, Alar, 843300, Xinjiang, China.
Yuxi JiangCollege of Animal Science, Tarim University, Tarim Road 1487, Alar, 843300, Xinjiang, China.
Aiyun ZhaoCollege of Animal Science, Tarim University, Tarim Road 1487, Alar, 843300, Xinjiang, China.
Chaochao LvCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Henan University of Science and Technology, Luoyang, 471003, China.
Meng QiCollege of Animal Science, Tarim University, Tarim Road 1487, Alar, 843300, Xinjiang, China. qimengdz@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4662-0398
Tarim University · CNHenan University of Science and Technology · CN

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 31702227Program for Young and Middle-aged Leading Science, Technology, and Innovation of Xinjiang Production & Construction Group 2018CB034
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective of this study was to determine the infection rate and genetic diversity of Cryptosporidium spp. in minks, foxes, and raccoon dogs, farmed in the Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Northwest China. Fresh fecal specimens were collected from individual cages of farmed minks (n = 214), blue foxes (n = 35), and raccoon dogs (n = 39) and examined using nested PCR based on the Cryptosporidium spp. small subunit rRNA gene. Cryptosporidium spp. was detected in 35 cages (12.2%, 35/288), with a higher infection rate detected in raccoon dogs (20.5%) compared with minks (12.1%) and blue foxes (2.9%). Sequence analysis showed that Cryptosporidium canis was the only species identified in blue foxes and raccoon dogs, while in the 26 Cryptosporidium-positive mink specimens, Cryptosporidium mink genotype (n = 17), C. canis (n = 7), and Cryptosporidium parvum (n = 2) were identified. Further analysis based on the 60-kDa glycoprotein (gp60) gene determined that both C. parvum isolates belonged to the subtype IIdA15G1, while eight of the 17 Cryptosporidium mink genotype isolates were a novel subtype that we have named XeA5G1. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of C. parvum subtype IIdA15G1 infection in minks. Since all the Cryptosporidium species/genotypes identified in minks, foxes, and raccoon dogs from Xinjiang have been previously found in humans, our results suggest that these fur animals may play a role in the transmission of zoonotic Cryptosporidium.

Indexed as

AnimalsChinaCryptosporidiosisCryptosporidiumFarmsFecesFoxesGenotypeHumansMinkPolymerase Chain ReactionRaccoon DogsRNA, Ribosomal, 18SRNA, Ribosomal, 18SChinaCryptosporidiumFoxMinkRaccoon dogSubtypingZoonotic

Identifiers

PMID33009948
OpenAlexW3091144180

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.