Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33009942›Full record

ArticleKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2021

The risk of graft impingement still exists in modern ACL surgery and correlates with degenerative MRI signal changes.

S Schützenberger, S Grabner, D Schallmayer, D Kontic, F Keller, C Fialka

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

S SchützenbergerDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, AUVA Traumacenter Meidling, Vienna, Austria. sebastian.schuetzenberger@auva.at.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0499-5397
S GrabnerDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, AUVA Traumacenter Meidling, Vienna, Austria.
D SchallmayerDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, AUVA Traumacenter Meidling, Vienna, Austria.
D KonticDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, AUVA Traumacenter Meidling, Vienna, Austria.
F KellerDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, AUVA Traumacenter Meidling, Vienna, Austria.
C FialkaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, AUVA Traumacenter Meidling, Vienna, Austria.

Funding

Allgemeine Unfallversicherungsanstalt ID 9/19
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAnatomic tunnel placement in ACL reconstruction is crucial to restore knee function. The aims of this study were to (i) evaluate the accuracy of tunnel placement for primary state-of-the-art ACL reconstruction, and (ii) examine the correlation between incorrect tunnel placement, graft appearance, and notch impingement.

methodsIn this retrospective study, all patients underwent primary single-bundle ACL reconstruction with independent drilling of the femoral and tibial tunnels according to anatomical landmarks. The accuracy of tunnel placement and the rate of notch impingement were analysed with MRI. The study cohort was subdivided according to the morphology of the graft: intact, degeneration, and re-rupture. The objective outcome was evaluated with the IKDC objective score, and the subjective outcomes were evaluated with the IKDC subjective score, the Lysholm knee score, the KOOS, and the Tegner activity scale score.

resultsEighty-seven consecutive patients with a mean follow-up of 3.8 ± 1.4 years were evaluated. There was no significant difference among the groups concerning the baseline characteristics. The re-rupture rate was 9.2%. The position of the femoral tunnel was correct in 92% of the patients, and the position of the tibial tunnel was correct in 93% of the patients. In the intact group, impingement was not found in any of the cases, whereas the rate of impingement in the degeneration (65%) and re-rupture (80%) groups was significantly higher than that in the intact group (p < 0.001). The risk of impingement was more likely with femoral (71% vs. 13%, p < 0.001) or tibial (100% vs. 11%, p < 0.001) malpositioning. The objective IKDC score was A in 52 patients (60%), B in 26 patients (30%), and C in 9 patients (10%). The average subjective IKDC score, Lysholm score, and KOOS were comparable in the intact and degeneration groups but significantly lower in the patient group with newly diagnosed re-ruptures (p = 0.05). The Tegner activity scale score was comparable in all three groups.

conclusionEven though the accuracy of femoral tunnel placement in modern single-bundle ACL reconstruction is greater, the risk of malpositioning and graft impingement remains. In our patient cohort, there was a clear correlation between ACL graft impingement, degenerative changes in MRI, and incorrect tunnel positioning. The surgeon must focus on accurate tunnel placement specific to individual patient anatomy. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Indexed as

Anterior Cruciate Ligament InjuriesAnterior Cruciate Ligament ReconstructionFemurHumansKnee JointMagnetic Resonance ImagingRetrospective StudiesTibiaACLACL reconstructionGraft impingementImpingementKneeNotch impingement

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.