Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33009875›Full record

ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2021

A comparative study of gradient nonlinearity correction strategies for processing diffusion data obtained with ultra-strong gradient MRI scanners.

Umesh Rudrapatna, Greg D Parker, Jamie Roberts, Derek K Jones

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Multimodal Quantitative Parameter Mapping Characterizes Low-dimensional Feature Organization and Tract-specific Signatures in White Matter.Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2026
    Article
  6. Engineering clinical translation of OGSE diffusion MRI.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Nonlinear Gradient Field Mapping Using a Spherical Grid Phantom for 3 and 7 Tesla MR Imaging Systems Equipped with High-performance Gradient Coils.Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. The impact of head orientation with respect to BImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Mapping the Impact of Approximate Gradient Nonlinearity Fields Correction on Tractography.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Umesh RudrapatnaCardiff University Brain Research Imaging Centre, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-7114-566X
Greg D ParkerCardiff University Brain Research Imaging Centre, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom.
Jamie RobertsRoyal United Hospitals Bath, NHS Foundation Trust, Bath, United Kingdom.
Derek K JonesCardiff University Brain Research Imaging Centre, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom.
Cardiff University · GBRoyal United Hospital Bath NHS Trust · GB

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 096646/Z/11/ZWellcome Trust 104943/Z/14/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe analysis of diffusion data obtained under large gradient nonlinearities necessitates corrections during data reconstruction and analysis. While two such preprocessing pipelines have been proposed, no comparative studies assessing their performance exist. Furthermore, both pipelines neglect the impact of subject motion during acquisition, which, in the presence of gradient nonlinearities, induces spatio-temporal B-matrix variations. Here, spatio-temporal B-matrix tracking (STB) is proposed and its performance compared to established pipelines.

methodsDiffusion tensor MRI (DT-MRI) was performed using a 300 mT/m gradient system. Data were acquired with volunteers positioned in regions with pronounced gradient nonlinearities, and used to compare the performance of six different processing pipelines, including STB.

resultsUp to 30% errors were observed in DT-MRI parameter estimates when neglecting gradient nonlinearities. Moreover, the order in which

conclusionsUnder large gradient nonlinearities, the choice of preprocessing pipeline significantly impacts the estimated diffusion parameters. Motion-induced spatio-temporal B-matrix variations can lead to systematic bias in the parameter estimates, that can be ameliorated using the proposed STB framework.

Indexed as

Diffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingMagnetic Resonance ImagingDiffusion Tensor ImagingHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMotionconnectomdiffusion MRIdiffusion preprocessinggradient nonlinearityhuman connectome projectultra-strong gradients

Identifiers

PMID33009875
PMCPMC8103165
OpenAlexW3091242961

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.