Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33009807›Full record

ArticleNicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco2021

Nicotine, Cotinine, and Tobacco-Specific Nitrosamines Measured in Children's Silicone Wristbands in Relation to Secondhand Smoke and E-cigarette Vapor Exposure.

Penelope J E Quintana, Nicolas Lopez-Galvez, Nathan G Dodder, Eunha Hoh, Georg E Matt, Joy M Zakarian, Mansi Vyas, Linda Chu, Brittany Akins, Samuel Padilla and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Assessing Nicotine Exposure in Users and Non-Users of Electronic Cigarettes Through Silicone Wristbands.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. An Assessment of Multipollutant Exposures Using Silicone Wristbands Among Bangladeshi Youth.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Chemical uptake into silicone wristbands over a five day period.Environmental pollution (Barking, Essex : 1987) · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Advanced Materials Design for Adsorption of Toxic Substances in Cigarette Smoke.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2023
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Silicone Wristbands in Exposure Assessment: Analytical Considerations and Comparison with Other Approaches.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Review
  18. Article
  19. E-Cigarette Toxicology.Annual review of pharmacology and toxicology · 2022
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Penelope J E QuintanaSchool of Public Health, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA.
Nicolas Lopez-GalvezSan Diego State University Research Foundation, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA.
Nathan G DodderSan Diego State University Research Foundation, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA.
Eunha HohSchool of Public Health, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA.
Georg E MattDepartment of Psychology, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA.
Joy M ZakarianSan Diego State University Research Foundation, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA.
Mansi VyasSchool of Public Health, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA.
Linda ChuSchool of Public Health, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA.
Brittany AkinsSchool of Public Health, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA.
Samuel PadillaSan Diego State University Research Foundation, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA.
Kim A AndersonEnvironmental and Molecular Toxicology, Oregon State University College of Agricultural Sciences, Corvallis, OR.
Melbourne F HovellSchool of Public Health, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA.
San Diego State University · USOregon State University · US

Funding

Supplement: Contribution of Thirdhand Smoke to Overall Tobacco SmokeR01ES027815 · NIEHS · CINCINNATI CHILDRENS HOSP MED CTR · PI MAHABEE-GITTENS, E. MELINDA, MATT, GEORG E · 2018 to 2022
$3.1M
NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES027815
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSimple silicone wristbands (WB) hold promise for exposure assessment in children. We previously reported strong correlations between nicotine in WB worn by children and urinary cotinine (UC). Here, we investigated differences in WB chemical concentrations among children exposed to secondhand smoke from conventional cigarettes (CC) or secondhand vapor from electronic cigarettes (EC), and children living with nonusers of either product (NS).

methodsChildren (n = 53) wore three WB and a passive nicotine air sampler for 7 days and one WB for 2 days, and gave a urine sample on day 7. Caregivers reported daily exposures during the 7-day period. We determined nicotine, cotinine, and tobacco-specific nitrosamines (TSNAs) concentrations in WB, nicotine in air samplers, and UC through isotope-dilution liquid chromatography with triple-quadrupole mass spectrometry.

resultsNicotine and cotinine levels in WB in children differentiated between groups of children recruited into NS, EC exposed, and CC exposed groups in a similar manner to UC. WB levels were significantly higher in the CC group (WB nicotine median 233.8 ng/g silicone, UC median 3.6 ng/mL, n = 15) than the EC group (WB nicotine median: 28.9 ng/g, UC 0.5 ng/mL, n = 19), and both CC and EC group levels were higher than the NS group (WB nicotine median: 3.7 ng/g, UC 0.1 ng/mL, n = 19). TSNAs, including the known carcinogen NNK, were detected in 39% of WB.

conclusionsSilicone WB show promise for sensitive detection of exposure to tobacco-related contaminants from traditional and electronic cigarettes and have potential for tobacco control efforts. IMPLICATIONS: Silicone WB worn by children can absorb nicotine, cotinine, and tobacco-specific nitrosamines, and amounts of these compounds are closely related to the child's urinary cotinine. Levels of tobacco-specific compounds in the silicone WB can distinguish patterns of children's exposure to secondhand smoke and e-cigarette vapor. Silicone WB are simple to use and acceptable to children and, therefore, may be useful for tobacco control activities such as parental awareness and behavior change, and effects of smoke-free policy implementation.

Indexed as

AdolescentCarcinogensChildChild, PreschoolCotinineE-Cigarette VaporElectronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsFemaleHumansMaleNicotineNitrosaminesSiliconesTobacco Smoke PollutionCarcinogensCotinineE-Cigarette VaporNicotineNitrosaminesSiliconesTobacco Smoke Pollution

Identifiers

PMID33009807
PMCPMC8248526
OpenAlexW3090201775

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.