Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33009595›Full record

ReviewEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology2021

Is it time to move away from polymyxins?: evidence and alternatives.

Rajeev Soman, Yamuna Devi Bakthavatchalam, Abinaya Nadarajan, Hariharan Triplicane Dwarakanathan, Ramasubramanian Venkatasubramanian, Balaji Veeraraghavan

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. JAC-antimicrobial resistance · 2026
    Article
  4. Clinical efficacy and risk factors of colistin sulfate in the treatment of carbapenemZhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences · 2026
    Article
  5. Observational
  6. Clinical microbiology reviews · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Rapid colorimetric polymyxin B microelution directly from positive blood bottles: because patients with serious infections should not have to wait for results of culture-based methodologies.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Ceftazidime-avibactam with or without Aztreonam vs Polymyxin-based Combination Therapy for Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae: A Retrospective Analysis.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Resistance to beta-lactams in Gram-negative bacilli: relevance and potential therapeutic alternatives.Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rajeev SomanDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Jupiter Hospital, Pune, India.
Yamuna Devi BakthavatchalamDepartment of Clinical Microbiology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, 632 004, India.
Abinaya NadarajanDepartment of Surgery, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India.
Hariharan Triplicane DwarakanathanDepartment of Orthopaedics, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India.
Ramasubramanian VenkatasubramanianDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Apollo Hospitals, Chennai, India.
Balaji VeeraraghavanDepartment of Clinical Microbiology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, 632 004, India. vbalaji@cmcvellore.ac.in.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8662-4257
Christian Medical College, Vellore · INApollo Hospitals · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Increasing burden of carbapenem resistance and resultant difficult-to-treat infections are of particular concern due to the lack of effective and safe treatment options. More recently, several new agents with activity against certain multidrug-resistant (MDR) and extensive drug-resistant (XDR) Gram-negative pathogens have been approved for clinical use. These include ceftazidime-avibactam, meropenem-vaborbactam, imipenem-cilastatin-relebactam, plazomicin, and cefiderocol. For the management of MBL infections, clinically used triple combination comprising ceftazidime-avibactam and aztreonam is hindered due to non-availability of antimicrobial susceptibility testing methods and lack of information on potential drug-drug interaction leading to PK changes impacting its safety and efficacy. Moreover, in several countries including Indian subcontinent and developing countries, these new agents are yet to be made available. Under these circumstances, polymyxins are the only last resort for the treatment of carbapenem-resistant infections. With the recent evidence of suboptimal PK/PD particularly in lung environment, limited efficacy and increased nephrotoxicity associated with polymyxin use, the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) has revised both colistin and polymyxin B breakpoints. Thus, polymyxins 'intermediate' breakpoint for Enterobacterales, P. aeruginosa, and Acinetobacter spp. are now set at ≤ 2 mg/L, implying limited clinical efficacy even for isolates with the MIC value 2 mg/L. This change has questioned the dependency on polymyxins in treating XDR infections. In this context, recently approved cefiderocol and phase 3 stage combination drug cefepime-zidebactam assume greater significance due to their potential to act as polymyxin-supplanting therapies.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial Proteinsbeta-Lactamase Inhibitorsbeta-LactamasesCarbapenemsDeveloping CountriesDrug Resistance, BacterialDrug Therapy, CombinationGram-Negative BacteriaGram-Negative Bacterial InfectionsHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsPolymyxinsAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial Proteinsbeta-Lactamase Inhibitorsbeta-LactamasescarbapenemaseCarbapenemsPolymyxinsCarbapenemCefepime-zidebactamCefiderocolColistinPolymyxin B

Identifiers

PMID33009595
OpenAlexW3090780191

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.