ArticleEuropean radiology2021
Contrast-enhanced cone beam breast CT features of breast cancers: correlation with immunohistochemical receptors and molecular subtypes.
Article in European radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- Preoperative prediction of Ki-67 expression and prognosis in breast cancer based on contrast-enhanced cone-beam breast CT: a two-centre study.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2026Article
- Assessment of breast cancer and feasibility of subtyping of breast cancer using thoracoabdominal staging photon-counting detector computed tomography.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Multimodal Radiogenomic Imaging in Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Implications for Dentomaxillofacial Radiology.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- A pilot study of multimodal MRI for the preoperative assessment of triple-negative breast cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Comparison of contrast-enhanced cone-beam breast CT, MRI, and mammography for breast cancer characterization.European radiology · 2025Article
- Comparative analysis of preoperative contrast-enhanced cone beam breast CT (CE-CBBCT) and MRI for differentiating pathological complete response from minimal residual disease in breast cancer.BMC medical imaging · 2025Article
- Breast cancer assessment under neoadjuvant systemic therapy using thoracic photon-counting detector computed tomography in prone position: a pilot study.European radiology experimental · 2025Article
- Nomogram for preoperative differentiation of benign and malignant breast tumors using contrast-enhanced cone-beam breast CT (CE CB-BCT) quantitative imaging and assessment features.La Radiologia medica · 2024Article
- Radiomics in cone-beam breast CT for the prediction of axillary lymph node metastasis in breast cancer: a multi-center multi-device study.European radiology · 2024Article
- Staging of breast cancer in the breast and regional lymph nodes using contrast-enhanced photon-counting detector CT: accuracy and potential impact on patient management.The British journal of radiology · 2024Article
- Radiomics nomogram for predicting axillary lymph node metastasis-a potential method to address the limitation of axilla coverage in cone-beam breast CT: a bi-center retrospective study.La Radiologia medica · 2023Article
- Correlation between contrast-enhanced cone-beam breast computed tomography features and prognostic staging in breast cancer.The British journal of radiology · 2022Article
- Dedicated breast CT: state of the art-Part II. Clinical application and future outlook.European radiology · 2022Review
- Assessment of Cone-Beam Breast Computed Tomography for Predicting Pathologic Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer: A Prospective Study.Journal of oncology · 2022Article
- Cone-Beam Breast Computed Tomography: Time for a New Paradigm in Breast Imaging.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo investigate the association of contrast-enhanced cone beam breast CT (CE-CBBCT) features, immunohistochemical (IHC) receptors, and molecular subtypes in breast cancer.
methodsIn this retrospective study, patients who underwent preoperative CE-CBBCT and received complete IHC results were analyzed. CE-CBBCT features were evaluated by two radiologists. Observer reproducibility and feature reliability were assessed. The association between CE-CBBCT features, IHC receptors, and molecular subtypes was analyzed using the chi-square, Mann-Whitney, and Kruskal-Wallis tests. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to assess the ability of combined imaging features to discriminate molecular subtypes. ROC curve was used to evaluate prediction performance.
resultsA total of 240 invasive cancers identified in 211 women were enrolled. Molecular subtypes of breast cancer were significantly associated with focality number of lesions, lesion type, tumor size, lesion density, internal enhancement pattern, degree of lesion enhancement (ΔHU), mass shape, spiculation, calcifications, calcification distribution, and increased peripheral vascularity of lesion (all p < 0.005), some of which also helped to differentiate IHC receptor status. A multivariate logistic regression model showed that tumor size (odds ratio, OR = 1.244), mass shape (OR = 0.311), spiculation (OR = 0.159), and internal enhancement pattern (OR = 0.227) were associated with differentiation between luminal and non-luminal subtypes (AUC = 0.809). Combined CE-CBBCT features, including lesion type (OR = 0.118), calcifications (OR = 0.181), and ΔHU (OR = 0.962), could be significant indicators of triple-negative versus HER-2-enriched subtypes (AUC = 0.913).
conclusionsCE-CBBCT features have the potential to help predict IHC receptor status and distinguish molecular subtypes of breast cancer, which could in turn help to develop individual treatment decisions and prognosis predictions. KEY POINTS: • A total of 11 CE-CBBCT features were associated with molecular subtypes, some of which also helped to differentiate IHC receptor status. • Tumor size, irregular mass shape, spiculation, and internal enhancement pattern could help identify luminal subtype. • Lesion type, calcification, and ΔHU could be significant indicators of HER-2- enriched versus triple-negative breast cancers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.