Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33009590›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2021

Contrast-enhanced cone beam breast CT features of breast cancers: correlation with immunohistochemical receptors and molecular subtypes.

Yue Ma, Aidi Liu, Avice M O'Connell, Yueqiang Zhu, Haijie Li, Peng Han, Lu Yin, Hong Lu, Zhaoxiang Ye

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Yue Ma *Department of Radiology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University, Ministry of Education, Huan-Hu-Xi Road, Ti-Yuan-Bei, Hexi District, Tianjin, 300060, People's Republic of China.
Aidi Liu *Department of Radiology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University, Ministry of Education, Huan-Hu-Xi Road, Ti-Yuan-Bei, Hexi District, Tianjin, 300060, People's Republic of China.
Avice M O'ConnellDepartment of Imaging Sciences, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, 14623, USA.
Yueqiang ZhuDepartment of Radiology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University, Ministry of Education, Huan-Hu-Xi Road, Ti-Yuan-Bei, Hexi District, Tianjin, 300060, People's Republic of China.
Haijie LiDepartment of Radiology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University, Ministry of Education, Huan-Hu-Xi Road, Ti-Yuan-Bei, Hexi District, Tianjin, 300060, People's Republic of China.
Peng HanDepartment of Radiology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University, Ministry of Education, Huan-Hu-Xi Road, Ti-Yuan-Bei, Hexi District, Tianjin, 300060, People's Republic of China.
Lu YinDepartment of Radiology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University, Ministry of Education, Huan-Hu-Xi Road, Ti-Yuan-Bei, Hexi District, Tianjin, 300060, People's Republic of China.
Hong LuDepartment of Radiology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University, Ministry of Education, Huan-Hu-Xi Road, Ti-Yuan-Bei, Hexi District, Tianjin, 300060, People's Republic of China.
Zhaoxiang YeDepartment of Radiology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University, Ministry of Education, Huan-Hu-Xi Road, Ti-Yuan-Bei, Hexi District, Tianjin, 300060, People's Republic of China. yezhaoxiang@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3157-8393
Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital · CNUniversity of Rochester Medical Center · US

Funding

Key Technologies Research and Development Program 2017YFC0112600Key Technologies Research and Development Program 2017YFC0112601National Natural Science Foundation of China 81571671Tianjin Science and Technology Major Project 19ZXDBSY00080
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo investigate the association of contrast-enhanced cone beam breast CT (CE-CBBCT) features, immunohistochemical (IHC) receptors, and molecular subtypes in breast cancer.

methodsIn this retrospective study, patients who underwent preoperative CE-CBBCT and received complete IHC results were analyzed. CE-CBBCT features were evaluated by two radiologists. Observer reproducibility and feature reliability were assessed. The association between CE-CBBCT features, IHC receptors, and molecular subtypes was analyzed using the chi-square, Mann-Whitney, and Kruskal-Wallis tests. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to assess the ability of combined imaging features to discriminate molecular subtypes. ROC curve was used to evaluate prediction performance.

resultsA total of 240 invasive cancers identified in 211 women were enrolled. Molecular subtypes of breast cancer were significantly associated with focality number of lesions, lesion type, tumor size, lesion density, internal enhancement pattern, degree of lesion enhancement (ΔHU), mass shape, spiculation, calcifications, calcification distribution, and increased peripheral vascularity of lesion (all p < 0.005), some of which also helped to differentiate IHC receptor status. A multivariate logistic regression model showed that tumor size (odds ratio, OR = 1.244), mass shape (OR = 0.311), spiculation (OR = 0.159), and internal enhancement pattern (OR = 0.227) were associated with differentiation between luminal and non-luminal subtypes (AUC = 0.809). Combined CE-CBBCT features, including lesion type (OR = 0.118), calcifications (OR = 0.181), and ΔHU (OR = 0.962), could be significant indicators of triple-negative versus HER-2-enriched subtypes (AUC = 0.913).

conclusionsCE-CBBCT features have the potential to help predict IHC receptor status and distinguish molecular subtypes of breast cancer, which could in turn help to develop individual treatment decisions and prognosis predictions. KEY POINTS: • A total of 11 CE-CBBCT features were associated with molecular subtypes, some of which also helped to differentiate IHC receptor status. • Tumor size, irregular mass shape, spiculation, and internal enhancement pattern could help identify luminal subtype. • Lesion type, calcification, and ΔHU could be significant indicators of HER-2- enriched versus triple-negative breast cancers.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsBreastCone-Beam Computed TomographyErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleHumansMammographyReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective StudiesErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesBreast neoplasmsCone beam computed tomographyImmunohistochemistrySemantics

Identifiers

PMID33009590
OpenAlexW3091059646

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.