Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33009491›Full record

SynthesisJournal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association2020

Neonatal Pain, Agitation, and Sedation Scale's use, reliability, and validity: a systematic review.

Mikayla E Morgan, Stephanie Kukora, Michelle Nemshak, Clayton J Shuman

3 registry-linked trialsAbstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 28 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06150586 completednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

The PALISA Study - Pain Assessment During Less-Invasive-Surfactant-Administration

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of ZurichRan2023 to 2024Enrolled21ConditionsInfant, Premature, Diseases, Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Surfactant Deficiency Syndrome Neonatal, PainArmsSkin Conductance (SC) Measurement, Video Recording
NCT06273202 naactive not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Ultrasound Monitoring of Muscle Thickness in Premature Patients Undergoing Infant Massage: Experience in a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit

TypeinterventionalSponsorFondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCSRan2024 to 2025Enrolled24ConditionsPrematurityArmsInfant Massage
NCT06889376 phase1not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

The Use of Intranasal Sedation With Midazolam to Reduce Stress, Discomfort and Procedural Pain in Preterm Newborns and Infants During Routine ROP Screening

TypeinterventionalSponsorPolish Mother Memorial Hospital Research InstituteRan2025 to 2025Enrolled40ConditionsDrug SafetyArmsIntranasal midazolam administration via the DART™ intranasal atomization device along with routine comfort care.
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Sucrose or glucose compared to breast milk for pain control in preterm infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Clinical rating scales for assessing pain in newborn infants.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. [Evidence-based guideline for neonatal pain management in China (2023)].Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics · 2023
    Guideline
  5. Review
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Accurate prediction of neurologic changes in critically ill infants using pose AI.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mikayla E MorganSchool of Nursing, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. mmikayla@umich.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7115-2293
Stephanie KukoraDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Michelle NemshakUniversity of Michigan Pediatric-Perinatal Nursing, C.S. Mott Children's Hospital, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0065-0754
Clayton J ShumanSchool of Nursing, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6072-9739

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Neonatal Pain, Agitation, and Sedation Scale (N-PASS) is recommended by the American Academy of Pediatrics to measure neonatal pain and sedation. However, little is known regarding its reliability and validity for diverse neonatal subpopulations. Twenty-nine studies were included in our review, demonstrating broad application of N-PASS and good or excellent reliability and validity for various neonatal subpopulations. Our systematic review found N-PASS to be valid and reliable for many but not all neonatal subpopulations. There is a lack of support for N-PASS reliability and validity for measuring prolonged pain and sedation in nonmechanically ventilated infants and for acute pain in postoperative infants in any gestational age category. Overall, N-PASS is a psychometrically sound and pragmatic instrument evaluating pain and sedation for most neonatal populations. Future research using N-PASS is encouraged to evaluate and report its validity and reliability, especially for neonatal subpopulations not included in this review.

Indexed as

PainProcedural SedationChildGestational AgeHumansInfantInfant, NewbornPain MeasurementReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.