Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33009477›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

The actual 5-year survivors of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma based on real-world data.

Axel Bengtsson, Roland Andersson, Daniel Ansari

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06198400 (Indocyanine Green Fluorescence in Evaluation of Post-resection Pancreatic Remnant Perfusion After Pancreaticoduodenectomy), which is not on this map. Cited by 279 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
279citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06198400 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Indocyanine Green Fluorescence in Evaluation of Post-resection Pancreatic Remnant Perfusion After Pancreaticoduodenectomy

TypeinterventionalSponsorCharles University, Czech RepublicRan2024 to 2027Enrolled60ConditionsPancreatic FistulaArmsPerioperative assessment of the perfusion of post-resection pancreatic remnant using indocyanine green-VerDye
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

279 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Economic evaluations of early detection strategies for pancreatic cancer: a systematic review.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. MRI for restaging pancreatic cancer.Insights into imaging · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. MLH1 promoter methylation in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: frequent but not prognostic.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Article
  15. A BioactivatedMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

219 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Axel BengtssonDepartment of Surgery, Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, 221 85, Lund, Sweden.
Roland AnderssonDepartment of Surgery, Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, 221 85, Lund, Sweden.
Daniel AnsariDepartment of Surgery, Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, 221 85, Lund, Sweden. daniel.ansari@med.lu.se.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Survival data for pancreatic cancer are usually based on actuarial calculations and actual long-term survival rates are rarely reported. Here we use population-level data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program for patients with microscopically confirmed pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma diagnosed from 1975 to 2011. A total of 84,275 patients with at least 5 years of follow-up were evaluated (follow-up cutoff date: December 31, 2016). Actual 5-year survival for pancreatic cancer increased from 0.9% in 1975 to 4.2% in 2011 in patients of all stages (p < 0.001), while in surgically resected patients, it rose from 1.5% to 17.4% (p < 0.001). In non-resected patients, the actual 5-year survival remained unchanged over the same time period (0.8% vs 0.9%; p = 0.121). Multivariable analysis of surgically resected patients diagnosed in the recent time era (2004-2011) showed that age, gender, grade, tumour size, TNM-stage and chemotherapy were significant independent predictors of actual 5-year survival, while age, grade and TNM-stage were significant independent predictors in non-resected patients. However, unfavourable clinicopathological factors did not preclude long-term survival. Collectively, our findings indicate that actual 5-year survival for pancreatic cancer is still below 5% despite improvement of survival for the subset of patients undergoing surgical resection.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaAgedCarcinoma, Pancreatic DuctalFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPancreatectomyPancreatic NeoplasmsSurvivors

Identifiers

PMID33009477
PMCPMC7532215

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.