Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33009069›Full record

ArticleDermatologic surgery : official publication for American Society for Dermatologic Surgery [et al.]2020

Development and Validation Clinician and Patient Reported Photonumeric Scales to Assess Buttocks Cellulite Severity.

Joel L Cohen, Neil S Sadick, M Todd Kirby, Michael P McLane, William R Lenderking, Randall H Bender, Jun Chen, David Hurley, Naomi B Knoble, Genzhou Liu and 3 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Dermatologic surgery : official publication for American Society for Dermatologic Surgery [et al.], 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Development and Validation of the Clinician Reported and Patient Reported Photonumeric Scales to Assess Buttocks Cellulite Severity: Erratum.Dermatologic surgery : official publication for American Society for Dermatologic Surgery [et al.] · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Joel L CohenAboutSkin Dermatology and DermSurgery, PC, Greenwood Village, Colorado.
Neil S SadickDepartment of Dermatology, Weill Cornell Medical College, Cornell University, New York, New York.
M Todd KirbyEndo Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Malvern, Pennsylvania.
Michael P McLaneEndo Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Malvern, Pennsylvania.
William R LenderkingEvidera, Bethesda, Maryland.
Randall H BenderEvidera, Bethesda, Maryland.
Jun ChenEvidera, Bethesda, Maryland.
David HurleyEndo Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Malvern, Pennsylvania.
Naomi B KnobleEvidera, Bethesda, Maryland.
Genzhou LiuEndo Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Malvern, Pennsylvania.
Qinfang XiangEndo Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Malvern, Pennsylvania.
Jeffrey A DavidsonEndo Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Malvern, Pennsylvania.
Mitchel P GoldmanCosmetic Laser Dermatology: A West Dermatology Company and Volunteer Clinical Professor of Dermatology, University of California, San Diego, California.
Endo Pharmaceuticals (United States) · USIthaka Harbors · USCornell University · USSensory Processing Disorder Foundation · USUniversity of California, San Diego · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Clinician Reported Photonumeric Cellulite Severity Scale (CR-PCSS) and Patient Reported PCSS (PR-PCSS) are newly developed tools for assessing cellulite severity.

objectiveTo report on the reliability, validity, and ability to detect a change in cellulite severity on the buttocks of adult women with the CR-PCSS and PR-PCSS. MATERIALS AND

methodsContent validity of both scales was established through concept elicitation and cognitive interviews. Test-retest reliability was evaluated, and intra-rater (both scales) and inter-rater (CR-PCSS only) reliability were estimated using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) for agreement and consistency. Ability to detect a change was determined using the Subject-Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) or Investigator-GAIS as anchors.

resultsFor the CR-PCSS (n = 6) at baseline and Day 2, the mean interrater ICCs were ≥0.70 and mean intrarater ICCs (95% confidence interval [CI]) were ≥0.81 (0.72-0.90) for both buttocks. For the PR-PCSS (n = 99) at baseline and Day 14, the mean test-retest reliability ICCs (95% CI) were ≥0.86 (0.79-0.91) for both buttocks. A clinically meaningful change was 1.0 point on the PR-PCSS and 1.0 on the CR-PCSS.

conclusionThe CR-PCSS and PR-PCSS reliably assess cellulite severity of the buttocks and can detect a clinically meaningful change after treatment for cellulite.

Indexed as

Patient Reported Outcome MeasuresSeverity of Illness IndexAdultAgedButtocksCelluliteClinical Trials, Phase I as TopicClinical Trials, Phase II as TopicDermatologistsEstheticsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedObserver VariationPhotography

Identifiers

PMID33009069
PMCPMC7685927
OpenAlexW3091092207

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.