Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33008931›Full record

ArticleJournal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine2021

Repeatability of

John P Crandall, Tyler J Fraum, MinYoung Lee, Linda Jiang, Perry Grigsby, Richard L Wahl

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review on radiomic analysis inCancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Value of [Scientific reports · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

John P CrandallMallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri; and.
Tyler J FraumMallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri; and.
MinYoung LeeMallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri; and.
Linda JiangMallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri; and.
Perry GrigsbyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Washington University in Saint Louis, St. Louis, Missouri.
Richard L WahlMallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri; and rwahl@wustl.edu.

Funding

Multi-Modality Quantitiative Imaging for Evaluation of Response to Cancer TherapyU01CA140204 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI DU, YONG, SOLNES, LILJA · 2011 to 2022
$6.1M
NCI NIH HHS U01 CA140204
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Knowledge of the intrinsic variability of radiomic features is essential to the proper interpretation of changes in these features over time. The primary aim of this study was to assess the test-retest repeatability of radiomic features extracted from

Indexed as

Fluorodeoxyglucose F18Image Processing, Computer-AssistedPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyFemaleHumansMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsUterine Cervical NeoplasmsFluorodeoxyglucose F18FDGPETradiomicsrepeatability

Identifiers

PMID33008931
PMCPMC8844259

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.