Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33008847›Full record

ArticleGlobal health, science and practice2020

The All Babies Count Initiative: Impact of a Health System Improvement Approach on Neonatal Care and Outcomes in Rwanda.

Hema Magge, Evrard Nahimana, Jean Claude Mugunga, Fulgence Nkikabahizi, Elisabeth Tadiri, Felix Sayinzoga, Anatole Manzi, Merab Nyishime, Francois Biziyaremye, Hari Iyer and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global health, science and practice, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Hema MaggeDivision of Global Health Equity, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA. Hema.magge@gmail.com.
Evrard NahimanaPartners In Health/Inshuti Mu Buzima, Rwinkwavu, Rwanda.
Jean Claude MugungaPartners In Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Fulgence NkikabahiziMinistry of Health, Government of Rwanda, Kigali, Rwanda.
Elisabeth TadiriCenter for Global Health, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Felix SayinzogaMinistry of Health, Government of Rwanda, Kigali, Rwanda.
Anatole ManziPartners In Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Merab NyishimePartners In Health/Inshuti Mu Buzima, Rwinkwavu, Rwanda.
Francois BiziyaremyePartners In Health/Inshuti Mu Buzima, Rwinkwavu, Rwanda.
Hari IyerDepartment of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Bethany Hedt-GauthierDepartment of Social Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Lisa R HirschhornDepartment of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPoor-quality care contributes to a significant portion of neonatal deaths globally. The All Babies Count (ABC) initiative was an 18-month district-wide approach designed to improve clinical and system performance across 2 rural Rwandan districts.

methodsThis pre-post intervention study measured change in maternal and newborn health (MNH) quality of care and neonatal mortality. Data from the facility and community health management information system and newly introduced indicators were extracted from facility registers. Medians and interquartile ranges were calculated for the health facility to assess changes over time, and a mixed-effects logistic regression model was created for neonatal mortality. A difference-in-differences analysis was conducted to compare the change in district neonatal mortality with the rest of rural Rwanda.

resultsImprovements were seen in multiple measures of facility readiness and MNH quality of care, including antenatal care coverage, preterm labor management, and postnatal care quality. District hospital case fatality decreased, with a statistically significant reduction in district neonatal mortality (odds ratio [OR]=0.54; 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.36, 0.83) and among preterm/low birth weight neonates (OR=0.47; 95% CI=0.25, 0.90). Neonatal mortality was reduced from 30.1 to 19.6 deaths/1,000 live births in the intervention districts and remained relatively stable in the rest of rural Rwanda (difference in differences -12.9).

conclusionThe ABC initiative contributed to improved MNH quality of care and outcomes in rural Rwanda. A combined clinical and health system improvement approach could be an effective strategy to improve quality and reduce neonatal mortality.

Indexed as

Rural PopulationHumansInfantInfant MortalityInfant, NewbornMaternal Health ServicesMedical MissionsMentoringPediatricsPrenatal CareQuality ImprovementRwanda

Identifiers

PMID33008847
PMCPMC7541121

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.