Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33008818›Full record

ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2020

Natural and Experimental Persistence of Highly Pathogenic H5 Influenza Viruses in Slurry of Domestic Ducks, with or without Lime Treatment.

Audrey Schmitz, Marion Pertusa, Sophie Le Bouquin, Nathalie Rousset, Katell Ogor, Marie-Odile LeBras, Claire Martenot, Patrick Daniel, Ana Belen Cepeda Hontecillas, Axelle Scoizec and 5 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Audrey SchmitzPloufragan-Plouzané-Niort Laboratory, Avian and Rabbit Virology, Immunology and Parasitology Unit, French National Reference Laboratory for Avian Influenza and Newcastle Disease, French Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health & Safety, Ploufragan, France audrey.schmitz@anses.fr.
Marion PertusaInstitut Technique de l'Aviculture, UMT Sanivol, Paris, France.
Sophie Le BouquinPloufragan-Plouzané-Niort Laboratory, Epidemiology, Health and Welfare in Animal Production Unit, French Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health & Safety, Ploufragan, France.
Nathalie RoussetInstitut Technique de l'Aviculture, UMT Sanivol, Paris, France.
Katell OgorPloufragan-Plouzané-Niort Laboratory, Avian and Rabbit Virology, Immunology and Parasitology Unit, French National Reference Laboratory for Avian Influenza and Newcastle Disease, French Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health & Safety, Ploufragan, France.
Marie-Odile LeBrasPloufragan-Plouzané-Niort Laboratory, Avian and Rabbit Virology, Immunology and Parasitology Unit, French National Reference Laboratory for Avian Influenza and Newcastle Disease, French Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health & Safety, Ploufragan, France.
Claire MartenotPloufragan-Plouzané-Niort Laboratory, Avian and Rabbit Virology, Immunology and Parasitology Unit, French National Reference Laboratory for Avian Influenza and Newcastle Disease, French Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health & Safety, Ploufragan, France.
Patrick DanielLaboratoire des Pyrénées et des Landes, Mont de Marsan, France.
Ana Belen Cepeda HontecillasLABOCEA Site de Ploufragan, Zoopôle, Ploufragan, France.
Axelle ScoizecPloufragan-Plouzané-Niort Laboratory, Epidemiology, Health and Welfare in Animal Production Unit, French Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health & Safety, Ploufragan, France.
Hervé MorinGrimaud Frères, Sèvremoine, France.
Pascale MassinPloufragan-Plouzané-Niort Laboratory, Avian and Rabbit Virology, Immunology and Parasitology Unit, French National Reference Laboratory for Avian Influenza and Newcastle Disease, French Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health & Safety, Ploufragan, France.
Béatrice GraslandPloufragan-Plouzané-Niort Laboratory, Avian and Rabbit Virology, Immunology and Parasitology Unit, French National Reference Laboratory for Avian Influenza and Newcastle Disease, French Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health & Safety, Ploufragan, France.
Eric NiqueuxPloufragan-Plouzané-Niort Laboratory, Avian and Rabbit Virology, Immunology and Parasitology Unit, French National Reference Laboratory for Avian Influenza and Newcastle Disease, French Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health & Safety, Ploufragan, France.
Nicolas EterradossiPloufragan-Plouzané-Niort Laboratory, Avian and Rabbit Virology, Immunology and Parasitology Unit, French National Reference Laboratory for Avian Influenza and Newcastle Disease, French Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health & Safety, Ploufragan, France.
Agence Nationale de Sécurité Sanitaire de l’Alimentation, de l’Environnement et du Travail · FRInstitut Technique de l'Aviculture · FRLaboratoire Dr Renaud · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Infections by A/H5 and A/H7 avian influenza viruses (AIVs) can cause acute disease and are therefore notifiable in poultry and wild birds. During winter 2015-2016, several cases of infection caused by highly pathogenic (HP) AIVs belonging to the A/H5N1, A/H5N2, and A/H5N9 subtypes were detected in southwestern France. Throughout winter 2016-2017, several cases of infections caused mainly by A/H5N8 HP AIV (A/goose/GD/1/1996, clade 2.3.4.4) were detected across Europe. On both occasions, the viruses were widely detected on palmiped farms in France. This study was designed to evaluate the persistence of A/H5 HP AIV in slurry from various duck productions. This was achieved (i) in the laboratory setting by artificially spiking four AIV-free slurry samples with known amounts of A/H5N9 HP AIV and monitoring virus infectivity, with or without lime treatment to achieve pH 10 or pH 12, and (ii) by sampling slurry tanks on five naturally A/H5N8 HP-contaminated farms. Experimental results in artificially spiked slurry suggested virus survival for 4 weeks in slurry from Muscovy or Pekin duck breeders and for 2 weeks in slurry from ducks for foie gras production during the assisted-feeding period, without lime treatment. Persistence of infectious A/H5N9 HP AIV in all slurry samples after lime treatment at pH 10 or pH 12 was less than 1 week. The A/H5N8 HP AIV persisted in naturally contaminated untreated slurry for 7 weeks. The results obtained provide experimental support for the 60-day storage period without treatment or the 7-day interval after lime treatment defined in French regulations for slurry sanitization.

Indexed as

DucksAnimal HusbandryAnimalsCalcium CompoundsCommunicable Disease ControlFranceIndustrial WasteInfluenza A Virus, H5N8 SubtypeInfluenza in BirdsOxidesPoultry DiseasesWastewaterCalcium CompoundsIndustrial WastelimeOxidesWastewateravian influenzaduckH5HPlime treatmentpersistenceslurry

Identifiers

PMID33008818
PMCPMC7688237
OpenAlexW3091228656

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.