Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33008815›Full record

ArticleClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2020

Implications of MYC Rearrangements in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma.

Nadine Abdallah, Linda B Baughn, S Vincent Rajkumar, Prashant Kapoor, Morie A Gertz, Angela Dispenzieri, Martha Q Lacy, Suzanne R Hayman, Francis K Buadi, David Dingli and 15 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. International Myeloma Society/International Myeloma Working Group Consensus Recommendations on the Definition of High-Risk Multiple Myeloma.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2025
    Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Defining High-Risk Disease Biology in Multiple Myeloma: A Narrative Review.Blood and lymphatic cancer : targets and therapy · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Impact of Rare Structural Variant Events in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2024
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Recent Advances in The Definition of the Molecular Alterations Occurring in Multiple Myeloma.Mediterranean journal of hematology and infectious diseases · 2024
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nadine AbdallahDivision of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.ORCID 0000-0001-9195-1589
Linda B BaughnDivision of Laboratory Genetics, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
S Vincent RajkumarDivision of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Prashant KapoorDivision of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Morie A GertzDivision of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.ORCID 0000-0002-3853-5196
Angela DispenzieriDivision of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Martha Q LacyDivision of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Suzanne R HaymanDivision of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Francis K BuadiDivision of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
David DingliDivision of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Ronald S GoDivision of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Yi L HwaDivision of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Amie FonderDivision of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Miriam HobbsDivision of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Yi LinDivision of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Nelson LeungDivision of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Taxiarchis KourelisDivision of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Rahma WarsameDivision of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Mustaqeem SiddiquiDivision of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
John LustDivision of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Robert A KyleDivision of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Rhett KetterlingDivision of Laboratory Genetics, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Leif BergsagelDivision of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona.ORCID 0000-0003-1523-7388
Patricia GreippDivision of Laboratory Genetics, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Shaji K KumarDivision of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota. kumar.shaji@mayo.edu.
Mayo Clinic · USMayo Clinic in Arizona · US

Funding

Project 4: Targeting Resistance to T-Cell Directed Therapy in Multiple MyelomaP50CA186781 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ARIZONA · PI Peter Leif Bergsagel · 2015 to 2026
$25.5M
Project 3 - Modeling Proteasome Inhibitor Response and Resistance in Cell Lines and Patient Samples with Single Cell Analysis of SubpopulationsU54CA224018 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ARIZONA · PI BERGSAGEL, PETER LEIF · 2017 to 2021
$6.0M
Prevalence and Progression of Monoclonal GammopathiesR01CA107476 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI KUMAR, SHAJI KUNNATHU, RAJKUMAR, S VINCENT · 2004 to 2018
$4.6M
Onset and biomarkers for progression of monoclonal gammopathiesR01CA168762 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI KUMAR, SHAJI KUNNATHU, RAJKUMAR, S VINCENT · 2012 to 2024
$3.2M
NCI NIH HHS P50 CA186781NCI NIH HHS R01 CA107476NCI NIH HHS R01 CA168762NCI NIH HHS U54 CA224018
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeRearrangements involving the MYC protooncogene are common in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma, but their prognostic significance is still unclear. The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of MYC rearrangement on clinical characteristics, treatment response, and survival in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. EXPERIMENTAL

designThis is a retrospective study including 1,342 patients seen in Mayo Clinic in Rochester, MN, from January 2006 to January 2018, who had cytogenetic testing by FISH at diagnosis, including MYC testing using the break apart FISH probe (8q24.1).

resultsA rearrangement involving MYC was found in 8% of patients and was associated with elevated β2-microglobulin, ≥50% bone marrow plasma cells, IgA multiple myeloma, and the cooccurrence of trisomies. There were no differences in overall response rates between patients with and without MYC rearrangement when induction chemotherapy was proteasome inhibitor (PI)-based, immunomodulatory drug (IMiD)-based or PI + IMiD-based. Overall survival was shorter in patients with MYC rearrangement compared with patients without MYC rearrangement (5.3 vs. 8.0 years,

conclusionsMYC rearrangement is associated with high disease burden and is an independent adverse prognostic factor in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma.

Indexed as

Chromosome AberrationsGene RearrangementAgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBiomarkers, TumorFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedMultiple MyelomaPrognosisProspective StudiesProto-Oncogene Proteins c-mycRetrospective StudiesSurvival RateBiomarkers, TumorMYC protein, humanProto-Oncogene Proteins c-myc

Identifiers

PMID33008815
PMCPMC8129639
OpenAlexW3089591731

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.