Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33008463›Full record

ArticleBMC oral health2020

Application of intraoral scanner to identify monozygotic twins.

Botond Simon, Laura Lipták, Klaudia Lipták, Ádám Domonkos Tárnoki, Dávid László Tárnoki, Dóra Melicher, János Vág

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC oral health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. DNA and protein analyses of hair in forensic genetics.International journal of legal medicine · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Botond SimonDepartment of Conservative Dentistry, Semmelweis University, Szentkirályi, utca 47, Budapest, H-1088, Hungary. dr.simon.botond@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-1851-1688
Laura LiptákFaculty of Dentistry, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Klaudia LiptákFaculty of Dentistry, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Ádám Domonkos TárnokiMedical Imaging Center, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Dávid László TárnokiMedical Imaging Center, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Dóra MelicherHungarian Twin Registry, Budapest, Hungary.
János VágDepartment of Conservative Dentistry, Semmelweis University, Szentkirályi, utca 47, Budapest, H-1088, Hungary.
Semmelweis University · HU

Funding

American Society of Forensic Odontology 2020 Research Grant AwardHungarian Scientific Research Fund EFOP-3.6.2-16-2017-00006Nemzeti Kutatási, Fejlesztési és Innovaciós Alap 2019-2.1.11-TÉT-2019-00048Nemzeti Kutatási, Fejlesztési és Innovaciós Alap ÚNKP-20-3-I-SE-23
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDNA base identification is a proper and high specificity method. However, identification could be challenged in a situation where there is no database or the DNA sequence is almost identical, as in the case of monozygotic (MZ) twins. The aim of this study was to introduce a novel forensic method for distinguishing between almost identical MZ twins by means of an intraoral scanner using the 3D digital pattern of the human palate.

methodsThe palatal area of 64 MZ twins and 33 same-sex dizygotic (DZ) twins (DZSS) and seven opposite-sex dizygotic twins (DZOS) were scanned three times with an intraoral scanner. From the scanned data, an STL file was created and exported into the GOM Inspect® inspection software. All scans within a twin pair were superimposed on each other. The average deviation between scans of the same subject (intra-subject deviation, ISD) and between scans of the two siblings within a twin pair (intra-twin deviation, ITD) was measured. One-sided tolerance interval covering 99% of the population with 99% confidence was calculated for the ISD (upper limit) and the ITD (lower limit).

resultsThe mean ISD of the palatal scan was 35.3 μm ± 0.78 μm. The calculated upper tolerance limit was 95 μm. The mean ITD of MZ twins (406 μm ± 15 μm) was significantly (p < 0.001) higher than the ISD, and it was significantly lower than the ITD of DZSS twins (594 μm ± 53 μm, p < 0.01) and the ITD of DZOS twins (853 μm ± 202 μm, p < 0.05).

conclusionThe reproducibility of palatal intraoral scans proved to be excellent. The morphology of the palate shows differences between members of MZ twins despite their almost identical DNA, indicating that this method could be useful in forensic odontology.

Indexed as

Twins, DizygoticTwins, MonozygoticHumansPalateReproducibility of ResultsSoftwareForensic odontologyHuman identificationIntraoral scannerMonozygotic twinPalatal rugaePalate

Identifiers

PMID33008463
PMCPMC7532102
OpenAlexW3089401884

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.