Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33008406›Full record

SynthesisBMC urology2020

The relationships between bariatric surgery and sexual function: current evidence based medicine.

Shengzhuo Liu, Dehong Cao, Zhengju Ren, Jinze Li, Lei Peng, Qin Zhang, Bo Cheng, Zheyu Cheng, Jianzhong Ai, Xiaonan Zheng and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC urology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Metabolic surgery in China: present and future.Journal of molecular cell biology · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Shengzhuo LiuDepartment of Urology, Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Dehong CaoDepartment of Urology, Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Zhengju RenDepartment of Urology, Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Jinze LiDepartmentofUrology, Nanchong CentralHospital, The Second ClinicalMedical College, NorthSichuanMedicalCollege (University), Nanchong, Sichuan, China.
Lei PengDepartmentofUrology, Nanchong CentralHospital, The Second ClinicalMedical College, NorthSichuanMedicalCollege (University), Nanchong, Sichuan, China.
Qin ZhangDepartment of Radiology, Chongqing Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Chongqing, China.
Bo ChengDepartment of Urology, Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Zheyu ChengDepartment of Urology, Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Jianzhong AiDepartment of Urology, Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Xiaonan ZhengDepartment of Urology, Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Liangren LiuDepartment of Urology, Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China. Liuliangren5-17@163.com.
Qiang WeiDepartment of Urology, Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China. weiqiang339@126.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6393-1625
Sichuan University · CNNorth Sichuan Medical University · CNFirst People's Hospital of Chongqing · CN

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 81974098Post-Doctor Research Project, West China Hospital, Sichuan University 2019HXBH089
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundControversy remains despite several studies have discussed the role of bariatric surgery in improving male's sexual function. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of bariatric surgery in promoting male's erectile function.

methodsPubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library, CNKI and Clinical Trails.gov were searched from database inception to May 2019. The language of publication was limited in English. The International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) score and Brief Male Sexual Function Inventory (BSFI) score were set as the primary outcome.

resultsEleven studies with a total of 370 patients were enrolled in this meta-analysis. The results showed significant improvement in the IIEF score (erectile function: MD = 5.33, 95% CI 4.12-6.54; intercourse satisfaction: MD = 2.57, 95% CI 1.19-3.94; orgasmic function: MD = 0.50, 95%CI 0.60-0.94; overall satisfaction: MD = 1.67, 95% CI 0.78-2.56; sexual desire: MD = 1.27, 95% CI 0.61-1.93; total erectile function: MD = 7.21, 95% CI 4.33-10.10) and the BSFI score (erection: MD =2.53, 95% CI 2.39-2.67; ejaculation: MD = 1.40, 95% CI 1.28-1.51; desire: MD =1.40, 95% CI 1.32-1.49; problem assessment: MD = 2.20, 95% CI 2.06-2.34; sexual satisfaction: MD = 0.70, 95% CI 0.60-0.76) in obese individuals after bariatric surgery.

conclusionsThis systematic review and meta-analysis indicated that bariatric surgery could be effective in promoting males's sexual function for obese individuals.

Indexed as

Bariatric SurgeryErectile DysfunctionEvidence-Based MedicineHumansMaleObesity, MorbidPenile ErectionTreatment OutcomeBariatric surgeryErectile functionMeta-analysisObesitySex hormoneSexual function

Identifiers

PMID33008406
PMCPMC7532646
OpenAlexW3090232378

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.