Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33008366›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2020

Education is an important factor in end-of-life care: results from a survey of Brazilian physicians' attitudes and knowledge in end-of-life medicine.

Thais Ioshimoto, Danielle Ioshimoto Shitara, Gilmar Fernades do Prado, Raymon Pizzoni, Rafael Hennemann Sassi, Aécio Flávio Teixeira de Gois

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Physicians' and Nurses' Knowledge in Palliative Care: Multidimensional Regression Models.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Thais IoshimotoDepartamento de Medicina. Rua Pedro de Toledo, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), 719, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Danielle Ioshimoto ShitaraDepartamento de Medicina. Rua Pedro de Toledo, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), 719, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Gilmar Fernades do PradoDepartamento de Medicina. Rua Pedro de Toledo, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), 719, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Raymon PizzoniDepartamento de Medicina. Rua Pedro de Toledo, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), 719, São Paulo, SP, Brazil. raymonpizzoni@gmail.com.
Rafael Hennemann SassiDepartamento de Medicina. Rua Pedro de Toledo, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), 719, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Aécio Flávio Teixeira de GoisDepartamento de Medicina. Rua Pedro de Toledo, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), 719, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAccording to the Latin America Association for palliative care, Brazil offers only 0.48 palliative care services per 1 million inhabitants. In 2012, no accredited physicians were working in palliative care, while only 1.1% of medical schools included palliative care education in their undergraduate curricula. As a reflection of the current scenario, little research about end-of-life care has been published so that studies addressing this subject in the Brazilian setting are crucial.

methodsA cross-sectional study study conducted with students applying for the medical residency of the Federal University of São Paulo were invited to voluntarily participate in an anonymous and self-administered questionnaire survey. The latter included demographic information, attitudes, prior training in end-of-life care, prior end-of-life care experience, the 20-item Palliative Care Knowledge Test (PCKT) and a consent term.

resultsOf the 3086 subjects applying for residency, 2349 (76%) answered the survey, 2225 were eligible for analysis while 124 were excluded due to incomplete data. Although the majority (99,2%) thought it was important to have palliative care education in the medical curriculum, less than half of them (46,2%) reported having received no education on palliative care. The overall performance in the PCKT was poor, with a mean score of 10,79 (± 3). While philosophical questions were correctly answered (81,8% of correct answers), most participants lacked knowledge in symptom control (50,7% for pain, 57,3% for dyspnea, 52,2% for psychiatric problems and 43,4% for gastrointestinal problems). Doctors that had already concluded a prior residency program and the ones that had prior experience with terminal patients performed better in the PCKT (p < 0,001). The high-performance group (more than 50% of correct answers) had received more training in end-of-life care, showed more interest in learning more about the subject, had a better sense of preparedness, as well as a higher percentage of experience in caring for terminal patients (p < 0,001).

conclusionsOur study showed that Brazilian physicians lack not only the knowledge, but also training in end-of-life medicine. Important factors to better knowledge in end-of-life care were prior training, previous contact with dying patients and prior medical residency. Corroborating the literature, for this group, training showed to be a key factor in overall in this area of knowledge. Therefore, Brazilian medical schools and residency programs should focus on improving palliative training, especially those involving contact with dying patients.

Indexed as

PhysiciansTerminal CareAttitudeBrazilCross-Sectional StudiesCurriculumDeathHumansPalliative CareSurveys and QuestionnairesDeveloping countriesEducationEnd-of-life careKnowledgeMedical residencyPalliative care knowledge test (PCKT)Palliative medicine

Identifiers

PMID33008366
PMCPMC7531127

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.