Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33008077›Full record

ArticleAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland)2020

Antimicrobial Resistance in Fecal

Kamonwan Lunha, Thongpan Leangapichart, Jatesada Jiwakanon, Sunpetch Angkititrakul, Marianne Sunde, Josef D Järhult, Gunilla Ström Hallenberg, Rachel A Hickman, Thomas Van Boeckel, Ulf Magnusson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Antimicrobial resistantOne health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. A One Health Comparative Study of MDRAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  5. Association of DiarrheagenicMicroorganisms · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Antibiogram ofVeterinary medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2024
    Article
  8. Antimicrobial Resistance in CommensalAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 5 countries.

Kamonwan LunhaDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, SE-750 07 Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-4080-763X
Thongpan LeangapichartSection for Food Safety and AMR, Norwegian Veterinary Institute, N-0106 Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-6358-5902
Jatesada JiwakanonResearch Group for Animal Health Technology, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-4824-1589
Sunpetch AngkititrakulResearch Group for Animal Health Technology, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-1701-907X
Marianne SundeSection for Food Safety and AMR, Norwegian Veterinary Institute, N-0106 Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-2326-4338
Josef D JärhultDepartment of Medical Sciences, Uppsala University, SE-751 85 Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-7075-1059
Gunilla Ström HallenbergDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, SE-750 07 Uppsala, Sweden.
Rachel A HickmanDepartment of Biomedical Chemistry and Microbiology, Uppsala University, SE-752 37 Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-0290-1836
Thomas Van BoeckelInstitute for Environmental Decisions, ETH, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland.
Ulf MagnussonDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, SE-750 07 Uppsala, Sweden.
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences · SEKhon Kaen University · THNorwegian Veterinary Institute · NOUppsala University · SECenter for Disease Dynamics, Economics & Policy · US

Funding

Joint Programming Initiative for AMR (JPIAMR) Reduce AMU project # 2017-026
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The overall aim of the current study was to test the hypotheses that (i) antibiotic resistance in bacteria were more frequent in clinically health pigs in intensified company owned, medium-scale farms (MSFs) (100-500 sows) than in pigs in family-owned, small-scale farms (SSFs) (1-50 sows) and (ii) that farmers working at the MSFs were more prone to attain antibiotic resistant bacteria than farmers working at SSFs. The study was conducted in North-Eastern Thailand, comprising fecal

Indexed as

antimicrobial resistancefarmersfarming intensificationpigsThailand

Identifiers

PMID33008077
PMCPMC7650604
OpenAlexW3089508001

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.