ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2020
Predictors of Long-Term Outcome in STEMI and NSTEMI-Insights from J-MINUET.
Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Multidomain Prediction Model Integrating Myocardial Injury, Ventricular Function, and Inflammation for Short-Term Risk Stratification in Patients with NSTEMI.Clinics and practice · 2026Article
- Recurrent myocardial infarction and adherence to secondary prevention strategies among adults with coronary artery disease in rural Aluva, South India: a nested case-control study.BMC public health · 2025Article
- One-Year Prognostic Differences and Management Strategies between ST-Elevation and Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Insights from the PRAISE Registry.American journal of cardiovascular drugs : drugs, devices, and other interventions · 2025Article
- Prevalence of influenza and other acute respiratory illnesses in patients with acute myocardial infarction in Bangladesh: A cross-sectional study.Health science reports · 2024Article
- Unraveling the Intricate Roles of Exosomes in Cardiovascular Diseases: A Comprehensive Review of Physiological Significance and Pathological Implications.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and non-ST- segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) share similar risk factors and comparable pathophysiology [...].
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.