Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33007801›Full record

Observational studyGenes2020

Characteristics of the IVF Cycle that Contribute to the Incidence of Mosaicism.

Lorena Rodrigo, Mónica Clemente-Císcar, Inmaculada Campos-Galindo, Vanessa Peinado, Carlos Simón, Carmen Rubio

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Genes, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Embryo Genetics.Genes · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Lorena RodrigoPreimplantation Genetic Testing Department, Igenomix, 46980 Valencia, Spain.
Mónica Clemente-CíscarFunctional Genomix & Bioinformatics Lab, Igenomix, 46980 Valencia, Spain.
Inmaculada Campos-GalindoPreimplantation Genetic Testing Department, Igenomix, 46980 Valencia, Spain.
Vanessa PeinadoPreimplantation Genetic Testing Department, Igenomix, 46980 Valencia, Spain.
Carlos SimónDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Valencia/Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria (INCLIVA), 46016 Valencia, Spain.
Carmen RubioResearch & Development Department, Igenomix and Igenomix Foundation, 46980 Valencia, Spain.
Igenomix · ESStanford University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Highly sensitive next-generation sequencing (NGS) platforms applied to preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) allow the classification of mosaicism in trophectoderm biopsies. However, the incidence of mosaicism reported by these tests can be affected by a wide number of analytical, biological, and clinical factors. With the use of a proprietary algorithm for automated diagnosis of aneuploidy and mosaicism, we retrospectively analyzed a large series of 115,368 trophectoderm biopsies from 27,436 PGT-A cycles to determine whether certain biological factors and

Indexed as

AneuploidyFertilization in VitroGenetic TestingMosaicismPreimplantation DiagnosisAdultBiopsyFemaleHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansIncidenceMaleMaternal AgePaternal AgeRetrospective StudiesSperm Countaneuploidyfemale agemosaicismNGSovarian responsePGT-Asegmentalvitrification

Identifiers

PMID33007801
PMCPMC7600993
OpenAlexW3091296835

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.